{"id":286,"date":"2023-03-13T17:37:29","date_gmt":"2023-03-13T17:37:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1220ushistsincecivilwar\/chapter\/module-6-10\/"},"modified":"2023-04-28T20:38:59","modified_gmt":"2023-04-28T20:38:59","slug":"module-6-10","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1220ushistsincecivilwar\/chapter\/module-6-10\/","title":{"raw":"6.10 Reagan\u2019s Foreign Policy","rendered":"6.10 Reagan\u2019s Foreign Policy"},"content":{"raw":"
\r\n\r\nThe conservative movement gained ground on gender and sexual politics, but it captured the entire battlefield on American foreign policy in the 1980s, at least for a time. Ronald Reagan entered office a committed Cold Warrior. He held the Soviet Union in contempt, denouncing it in a 1983 speech as an \u201cevil empire.\u201d1<\/sup><\/a> And he never doubted that the Soviet Union would end up \u201con the ash heap of history,\u201d as he said in a 1982 speech to the British Parliament.2<\/sup><\/a> Indeed, Reagan believed it was the duty of the United States to speed the Soviet Union to its inevitable demise. His Reagan Doctrine declared that the United States would supply aid to anticommunist forces everywhere in the world.3<\/sup><\/a> To give this doctrine force, Reagan oversaw an enormous expansion in the defense budget. Federal spending on defense rose from $171 billion in 1981 to $229 billion in 1985, the highest level since the Vietnam War.4<\/sup><\/a> He described this as a policy of \u201cpeace through strength,\u201d a phrase that appealed to Americans who, during the 1970s, feared that the United States was losing its status as the world\u2019s most powerful nation. Yet the irony is that Reagan, for all his militarism, helped bring the Cold War to an end through negotiation, a tactic he had once scorned.\r\n\r\nReagan\u2019s election came at a time when many Americans feared their country was in an irreversible decline. American forces withdrew in disarray from South Vietnam in 1975. The United States returned control of the Panama Canal to Panama in 1978, despite protests from conservatives. Pro-American dictators were toppled in Iran and Nicaragua in 1979. The Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan that same year, leading conservatives to warn about American weakness in the face of Soviet expansion. Reagan spoke to fears of decline and warned, in 1976, that \u201cthis nation has become Number Two in a world where it is dangerous\u2014if not fatal\u2014to be second best.5<\/sup><\/a>\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"700\"]\"Margaret Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan, pictured here at Camp David in December 1984, led two of the world\u2019s most powerful countries and formed an alliance that benefited both throughout their tenures in office. Wikimedia<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\nThe Reagan administration made Latin America a showcase for its newly assertive policies. Jimmy Carter had sought to promote human rights in the region, but Reagan and his advisors scrapped this approach and instead focused on fighting communism\u2014a term they applied to all Latin American left-wing movements. And so when communists with ties to Cuba overthrew the government of the Caribbean nation of Grenada in October 1983, Reagan dispatched the U.S. Marines to the island. Dubbed Operation Urgent Fury, the Grenada invasion overthrew the leftist government after less than a week of fighting. Despite the relatively minor nature of the mission, its success gave victory-hungry Americans something to cheer about after the military debacles of the previous two decades.\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"700\"]\"Operation Operation Urgent Fury, the U.S. invasion of Grenada, was broadly supported by the U.S. public. This photograph shows the deployment of U.S. Army Rangers into Grenada. Photograph, October 25, 1983. Wikimedia<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\nGrenada was the only time Reagan deployed the American military in Latin America, but the United States also influenced the region by supporting right-wing, anticommunist movements there. From 1981 to 1990, the United States gave more than $4 billion to the government of El Salvador in a largely futile effort to defeat the guerrillas of the Farabundo Mart\u00ed National Liberation Front (FMLN).6<\/sup><\/a> Salvadoran security forces equipped with American weapons committed numerous atrocities, including the slaughter of almost one thousand civilians at the village of El Mozote in December 1981.\r\n\r\nThe Reagan administration took a more cautious approach in the Middle East, where its policy was determined by a mix of anticommunism and hostility toward the Islamic government of Iran. When Iraq invaded Iran in 1980, the United States supplied Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein with military intelligence and business credits\u2014even after it became clear that Iraqi forces were using chemical weapons. Reagan\u2019s greatest setback in the Middle East came in 1982, when, shortly after Israel invaded Lebanon, he dispatched Marines to the Lebanese city of Beirut to serve as a peacekeeping force. On October 23, 1983, a suicide bomber killed 241 Marines stationed in Beirut. Congressional pressure and anger from the American public forced Reagan to recall the Marines from Lebanon in March 1984. Reagan\u2019s decision demonstrated that, for all his talk of restoring American power, he took a pragmatic approach to foreign policy. He was unwilling to risk another Vietnam by committing American troops to Lebanon.\r\n

Though Reagan\u2019s policies toward Central America and the Middle East aroused protest, his policy on nuclear weapons generated the most controversy. Initially Reagan followed the examples of presidents Nixon, Ford, and Carter by pursuing arms limitation talks with the Soviet Union. American officials participated in the Intermediate-range Nuclear Force (INF) Talks that began in 1981 and the Strategic Arms Reduction Talks (START) in 1982. But the breakdown of these talks in 1983 led Reagan to proceed with plans to place Pershing II nuclear missiles in Western Europe to counter Soviet SS-20 missiles in Eastern Europe. Reagan went a step further in March 1983, when he announced plans for a Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), a space-based system that could shoot down incoming Soviet missiles. Critics derided the program as a \u201cStar Wars\u201d fantasy, and even Reagan\u2019s advisors harbored doubts. \u201cWe don\u2019t have the technology to do this,\u201d secretary of state George Shultz told aides.7<\/sup><\/a> These aggressive policies fed a growing nuclear freeze movement throughout the world. In the United States, organizations like the Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy organized protests that culminated in a June 1982 rally that drew almost a million people to New York City\u2019s Central Park.<\/p>\r\n \r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"700\"]\"President President Reagan proposed new space- and ground-based defense systems to protect the United States from nuclear missiles in his 1984 Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Scientists argued that it was technologically unfeasible, and it was lambasted in the media as the \u201cStar Wars\u201d program. Wikimedia<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\nProtests in the streets were echoed by resistance in Congress. Congressional Democrats opposed Reagan\u2019s policies on the merits; congressional Republicans, though they supported Reagan\u2019s anticommunism, were wary of the administration\u2019s fondness for circumventing Congress. In 1982, the House voted 411\u20130 to approve the Boland Amendment, which barred the United States from supplying funds to the contras, a right-wing insurgency fighting the leftist Sandinista government in Nicaragua. Reagan, overlooking the contras\u2019 brutal tactics, hailed them as the \u201cmoral equivalent of the Founding Fathers.\u201d8<\/sup><\/a> The Reagan administration\u2019s determination to flout these amendments led to a scandal that almost destroyed Reagan\u2019s presidency. Robert MacFarlane, the president\u2019s national security advisor, and Oliver North, a member of the National Security Council, raised money to support the contras by selling American missiles to Iran and funneling the money to Nicaragua. When their scheme was revealed in 1986, it was hugely embarrassing for Reagan. The president\u2019s underlings had not only violated the Boland Amendment but had also, by selling arms to Iran, made a mockery of Reagan\u2019s declaration that \u201cAmerica will never make concessions to the terrorists.\u201d But while the Iran-Contra affair generated comparisons to the Watergate scandal, investigators were never able to prove Reagan knew about the operation. Without such a \u201csmoking gun,\u201d talk of impeaching Reagan remained simply talk.\r\n\r\nThough the Iran-Contra scandal tarnished the Reagan administration\u2019s image, it did not derail Reagan\u2019s most significant achievement: easing tensions with the Soviet Union. This would have seemed impossible in Reagan\u2019s first term, when the president exchanged harsh words with a rapid succession of Soviet leaders\u2014Leonid Brezhnev, Yuri Andropov, and Konstantin Chernenko. In 1985, however, the aged Chernenko\u2019s death handed leadership of the Soviet Union to Mikhail Gorbachev, who, while a true believer in socialism, nonetheless realized that the Soviet Union desperately needed to reform itself. He instituted a program of perestroika<\/em>, which referred to the restructuring of the Soviet system, and of glasnost<\/em>, which meant greater transparency in government. Gorbachev also reached out to Reagan in hopes of negotiating an end to the arms race, which was bankrupting the Soviet Union. Reagan and Gorbachev met in Geneva, Switzerland, in 1985 and Reykjavik, Iceland, in 1986. The summits failed to produce any concrete agreements, but the two leaders developed a relationship unprecedented in the history of U.S.-Soviet relations. This trust made possible the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty of 1987, which committed both sides to a sharp reduction in their nuclear arsenal.\r\n\r\nBy the late 1980s the Soviet empire was crumbling. Reagan successfully combined anticommunist rhetoric (such as his 1987 speech at the Berlin Wall, where he declared, \u201cGeneral Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace . . . tear down this wall!\u201d) with a willingness to negotiate with Soviet leadership.9<\/sup><\/a> But the most significant causes of collapse lay within the Soviet empire itself. Soviet-allied governments in Eastern Europe tottered under pressure from dissident organizations like Poland\u2019s Solidarity and East Germany\u2019s Neues Forum. Some of these countries, such as Poland, were also pressured from within by the Roman Catholic Church, which had turned toward active anti-communism under Pope John Paul II. When Gorbachev made it clear that he would not send the Soviet military to prop up these regimes, they collapsed one by one in 1989\u2014in Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Bulgaria, and East Germany. Within the Soviet Union, Gorbachev\u2019s proposed reforms unraveled the decaying Soviet system rather than bringing stability. By 1991 the Soviet Union itself had vanished, dissolving into a Commonwealth of Independent States.\r\n\r\nReagan left office in 1988 with the Cold War waning and the economy booming. Unemployment had dipped to 5 percent by 1988.10<\/sup><\/a> Between 1981 and 1986, gas prices fell from $1.38 per gallon to 95\u00a2.11<\/sup><\/a> The stock market recovered from the crash, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average\u2014which stood at 950 in 1981\u2014reached 2,239 by the end of Reagan\u2019s second term.12<\/sup><\/a> Yet the economic gains of the decade were unequally distributed. The top fifth of households enjoyed rising incomes while the rest stagnated or declined.13<\/sup><\/a> In constant dollars, annual chief executive officer (CEO) pay rose from $3 million in 1980 to roughly $12 million during Reagan\u2019s last year in the White House.14<\/sup><\/a> Between 1985 and 1989 the number of Americans living in poverty remained steady at thirty-three million.15<\/sup><\/a> Real per capita money income grew at only 2 percent per year, a rate roughly equal to the Carter years.16<\/sup><\/a> The American economy saw more jobs created than lost during the 1980s, but half of the jobs eliminated were in high-paying industries.17<\/sup><\/a> Furthermore, half of the new jobs failed to pay wages above the poverty line. The economic divide was most acute for African Americans and Latinos, one-third of whom qualified as poor.\r\n\r\nThe triumph of the right proved incomplete. The number of government employees actually increased under Reagan. With more than 80 percent of the federal budget committed to defense, entitlement programs, and interest on the national debt, the right\u2019s goal of deficit elimination floundered for lack of substantial areas to cut.18<\/sup><\/a> Between 1980 and 1989 the national debt rose from $914 billion to $2.7 trillion.19<\/sup><\/a> Despite steep tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy, the overall tax burden of the American public basically remained unchanged. Moreover, so-called regressive taxes on payroll and certain goods actually increased the tax burden on low- and middle-income Americans. Finally, Reagan slowed but failed to vanquish the five-decade legacy of economic liberalism. Most New Deal and Great Society proved durable. Government still offered its neediest citizens a safety net, if a now continually shrinking one.\r\n\r\nYet the discourse of American politics had irrevocably changed. The preeminence of conservative political ideas grew ever more pronounced, even when Democrats controlled Congress or the White House. In response to the conservative mood of the country, the Democratic Party adapted its own message to accommodate many of the Republicans\u2019 Reagan-era ideas and innovations. The United States was on a rightward path.\r\n

Notes<\/h4>\r\n
    \r\n \t
  1. Sean Wilentz, The Age of Reagan: A History, 1974\u20132008<\/em> (New York: HarperCollins, 2008), 163. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  2. Lou Cannon, \u201cPresident Calls for \u2018Crusade\u2019: Reagan Proposes Plan to Counter Soviet Challenge,\u201d Washington Post<\/em>, June 9, 1982, A1. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  3. Conservative newspaper columnist Charles Krauthammer coined the phrase. See Wilentz, Age of Reagan<\/em>, 157. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  4. James T. Patterson, Restless Giant: The United States from Watergate to Bush v. Gore<\/em> (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), 205. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  5. Laura Kalman, Right Star Rising: A New Politics, 1974\u20131980 <\/em>(New York: Norton, 2010), 166\u2013167. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  6. Ronald Reagan, \u201cAddress to the Nation on United States Policy in Central America,\u201d May 9, 1984, http:\/\/www.reagan.utexas.edu\/archives\/speeches\/1984\/50984h.htm.. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  7. Frances Fitzgerald, Way out There in the Blue: Reagan, Star Wars, and the End of the Cold War<\/em> (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000), 205. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  8. Ronald Reagan, \u201cRemarks at the Annual Dinner of the Conservative Political Action Conference,\u201d March 1, 1985, http:\/\/www.presidency.ucsb.edu\/ws\/?pid=38274. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  9. Lou Cannon, \u201cReagan Challenges Soviets to Dismantle Berlin Wall: Aides Disappointed at Crowd\u2019s Lukewarm Reception,\u201d Washington Post<\/em>, June 13, 1987, A1. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  10. Patterson, Restless Giant<\/em>, 163. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  11. Ibid., 163. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  12. Ibid., 163. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  13. Bruce J. Schulman and Julian Zelizer, eds., Rightward Bound: Making America Conservative in the 1970s<\/em> (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008), 32. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  14. Patterson, Restless Giant<\/em>, 186. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  15. Ibid., 164. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  16. Ibid., 166. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  17. William Chafe, The Unfinished Journey: America Since World War II<\/em> (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), 488. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  18. Jacobs and Zelizer, Conservatives in Power<\/em>, 31. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  19. Patterson, Restless Giant<\/em>, 158. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>","rendered":"
    \n

    The conservative movement gained ground on gender and sexual politics, but it captured the entire battlefield on American foreign policy in the 1980s, at least for a time. Ronald Reagan entered office a committed Cold Warrior. He held the Soviet Union in contempt, denouncing it in a 1983 speech as an \u201cevil empire.\u201d1<\/sup><\/a> And he never doubted that the Soviet Union would end up \u201con the ash heap of history,\u201d as he said in a 1982 speech to the British Parliament.2<\/sup><\/a> Indeed, Reagan believed it was the duty of the United States to speed the Soviet Union to its inevitable demise. His Reagan Doctrine declared that the United States would supply aid to anticommunist forces everywhere in the world.3<\/sup><\/a> To give this doctrine force, Reagan oversaw an enormous expansion in the defense budget. Federal spending on defense rose from $171 billion in 1981 to $229 billion in 1985, the highest level since the Vietnam War.4<\/sup><\/a> He described this as a policy of \u201cpeace through strength,\u201d a phrase that appealed to Americans who, during the 1970s, feared that the United States was losing its status as the world\u2019s most powerful nation. Yet the irony is that Reagan, for all his militarism, helped bring the Cold War to an end through negotiation, a tactic he had once scorned.<\/p>\n

    Reagan\u2019s election came at a time when many Americans feared their country was in an irreversible decline. American forces withdrew in disarray from South Vietnam in 1975. The United States returned control of the Panama Canal to Panama in 1978, despite protests from conservatives. Pro-American dictators were toppled in Iran and Nicaragua in 1979. The Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan that same year, leading conservatives to warn about American weakness in the face of Soviet expansion. Reagan spoke to fears of decline and warned, in 1976, that \u201cthis nation has become Number Two in a world where it is dangerous\u2014if not fatal\u2014to be second best.5<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    \"Margaret
    Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan, pictured here at Camp David in December 1984, led two of the world\u2019s most powerful countries and formed an alliance that benefited both throughout their tenures in office. Wikimedia<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

     <\/p>\n

    The Reagan administration made Latin America a showcase for its newly assertive policies. Jimmy Carter had sought to promote human rights in the region, but Reagan and his advisors scrapped this approach and instead focused on fighting communism\u2014a term they applied to all Latin American left-wing movements. And so when communists with ties to Cuba overthrew the government of the Caribbean nation of Grenada in October 1983, Reagan dispatched the U.S. Marines to the island. Dubbed Operation Urgent Fury, the Grenada invasion overthrew the leftist government after less than a week of fighting. Despite the relatively minor nature of the mission, its success gave victory-hungry Americans something to cheer about after the military debacles of the previous two decades.<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    \"Operation
    Operation Urgent Fury, the U.S. invasion of Grenada, was broadly supported by the U.S. public. This photograph shows the deployment of U.S. Army Rangers into Grenada. Photograph, October 25, 1983. Wikimedia<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

     <\/p>\n

    Grenada was the only time Reagan deployed the American military in Latin America, but the United States also influenced the region by supporting right-wing, anticommunist movements there. From 1981 to 1990, the United States gave more than $4 billion to the government of El Salvador in a largely futile effort to defeat the guerrillas of the Farabundo Mart\u00ed National Liberation Front (FMLN).6<\/sup><\/a> Salvadoran security forces equipped with American weapons committed numerous atrocities, including the slaughter of almost one thousand civilians at the village of El Mozote in December 1981.<\/p>\n

    The Reagan administration took a more cautious approach in the Middle East, where its policy was determined by a mix of anticommunism and hostility toward the Islamic government of Iran. When Iraq invaded Iran in 1980, the United States supplied Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein with military intelligence and business credits\u2014even after it became clear that Iraqi forces were using chemical weapons. Reagan\u2019s greatest setback in the Middle East came in 1982, when, shortly after Israel invaded Lebanon, he dispatched Marines to the Lebanese city of Beirut to serve as a peacekeeping force. On October 23, 1983, a suicide bomber killed 241 Marines stationed in Beirut. Congressional pressure and anger from the American public forced Reagan to recall the Marines from Lebanon in March 1984. Reagan\u2019s decision demonstrated that, for all his talk of restoring American power, he took a pragmatic approach to foreign policy. He was unwilling to risk another Vietnam by committing American troops to Lebanon.<\/p>\n

    Though Reagan\u2019s policies toward Central America and the Middle East aroused protest, his policy on nuclear weapons generated the most controversy. Initially Reagan followed the examples of presidents Nixon, Ford, and Carter by pursuing arms limitation talks with the Soviet Union. American officials participated in the Intermediate-range Nuclear Force (INF) Talks that began in 1981 and the Strategic Arms Reduction Talks (START) in 1982. But the breakdown of these talks in 1983 led Reagan to proceed with plans to place Pershing II nuclear missiles in Western Europe to counter Soviet SS-20 missiles in Eastern Europe. Reagan went a step further in March 1983, when he announced plans for a Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI), a space-based system that could shoot down incoming Soviet missiles. Critics derided the program as a \u201cStar Wars\u201d fantasy, and even Reagan\u2019s advisors harbored doubts. \u201cWe don\u2019t have the technology to do this,\u201d secretary of state George Shultz told aides.7<\/sup><\/a> These aggressive policies fed a growing nuclear freeze movement throughout the world. In the United States, organizations like the Committee for a Sane Nuclear Policy organized protests that culminated in a June 1982 rally that drew almost a million people to New York City\u2019s Central Park.<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    \"President
    President Reagan proposed new space- and ground-based defense systems to protect the United States from nuclear missiles in his 1984 Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Scientists argued that it was technologically unfeasible, and it was lambasted in the media as the \u201cStar Wars\u201d program. Wikimedia<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

     <\/p>\n

    Protests in the streets were echoed by resistance in Congress. Congressional Democrats opposed Reagan\u2019s policies on the merits; congressional Republicans, though they supported Reagan\u2019s anticommunism, were wary of the administration\u2019s fondness for circumventing Congress. In 1982, the House voted 411\u20130 to approve the Boland Amendment, which barred the United States from supplying funds to the contras, a right-wing insurgency fighting the leftist Sandinista government in Nicaragua. Reagan, overlooking the contras\u2019 brutal tactics, hailed them as the \u201cmoral equivalent of the Founding Fathers.\u201d8<\/sup><\/a> The Reagan administration\u2019s determination to flout these amendments led to a scandal that almost destroyed Reagan\u2019s presidency. Robert MacFarlane, the president\u2019s national security advisor, and Oliver North, a member of the National Security Council, raised money to support the contras by selling American missiles to Iran and funneling the money to Nicaragua. When their scheme was revealed in 1986, it was hugely embarrassing for Reagan. The president\u2019s underlings had not only violated the Boland Amendment but had also, by selling arms to Iran, made a mockery of Reagan\u2019s declaration that \u201cAmerica will never make concessions to the terrorists.\u201d But while the Iran-Contra affair generated comparisons to the Watergate scandal, investigators were never able to prove Reagan knew about the operation. Without such a \u201csmoking gun,\u201d talk of impeaching Reagan remained simply talk.<\/p>\n

    Though the Iran-Contra scandal tarnished the Reagan administration\u2019s image, it did not derail Reagan\u2019s most significant achievement: easing tensions with the Soviet Union. This would have seemed impossible in Reagan\u2019s first term, when the president exchanged harsh words with a rapid succession of Soviet leaders\u2014Leonid Brezhnev, Yuri Andropov, and Konstantin Chernenko. In 1985, however, the aged Chernenko\u2019s death handed leadership of the Soviet Union to Mikhail Gorbachev, who, while a true believer in socialism, nonetheless realized that the Soviet Union desperately needed to reform itself. He instituted a program of perestroika<\/em>, which referred to the restructuring of the Soviet system, and of glasnost<\/em>, which meant greater transparency in government. Gorbachev also reached out to Reagan in hopes of negotiating an end to the arms race, which was bankrupting the Soviet Union. Reagan and Gorbachev met in Geneva, Switzerland, in 1985 and Reykjavik, Iceland, in 1986. The summits failed to produce any concrete agreements, but the two leaders developed a relationship unprecedented in the history of U.S.-Soviet relations. This trust made possible the Intermediate Nuclear Forces Treaty of 1987, which committed both sides to a sharp reduction in their nuclear arsenal.<\/p>\n

    By the late 1980s the Soviet empire was crumbling. Reagan successfully combined anticommunist rhetoric (such as his 1987 speech at the Berlin Wall, where he declared, \u201cGeneral Secretary Gorbachev, if you seek peace . . . tear down this wall!\u201d) with a willingness to negotiate with Soviet leadership.9<\/sup><\/a> But the most significant causes of collapse lay within the Soviet empire itself. Soviet-allied governments in Eastern Europe tottered under pressure from dissident organizations like Poland\u2019s Solidarity and East Germany\u2019s Neues Forum. Some of these countries, such as Poland, were also pressured from within by the Roman Catholic Church, which had turned toward active anti-communism under Pope John Paul II. When Gorbachev made it clear that he would not send the Soviet military to prop up these regimes, they collapsed one by one in 1989\u2014in Poland, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Romania, Bulgaria, and East Germany. Within the Soviet Union, Gorbachev\u2019s proposed reforms unraveled the decaying Soviet system rather than bringing stability. By 1991 the Soviet Union itself had vanished, dissolving into a Commonwealth of Independent States.<\/p>\n

    Reagan left office in 1988 with the Cold War waning and the economy booming. Unemployment had dipped to 5 percent by 1988.10<\/sup><\/a> Between 1981 and 1986, gas prices fell from $1.38 per gallon to 95\u00a2.11<\/sup><\/a> The stock market recovered from the crash, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average\u2014which stood at 950 in 1981\u2014reached 2,239 by the end of Reagan\u2019s second term.12<\/sup><\/a> Yet the economic gains of the decade were unequally distributed. The top fifth of households enjoyed rising incomes while the rest stagnated or declined.13<\/sup><\/a> In constant dollars, annual chief executive officer (CEO) pay rose from $3 million in 1980 to roughly $12 million during Reagan\u2019s last year in the White House.14<\/sup><\/a> Between 1985 and 1989 the number of Americans living in poverty remained steady at thirty-three million.15<\/sup><\/a> Real per capita money income grew at only 2 percent per year, a rate roughly equal to the Carter years.16<\/sup><\/a> The American economy saw more jobs created than lost during the 1980s, but half of the jobs eliminated were in high-paying industries.17<\/sup><\/a> Furthermore, half of the new jobs failed to pay wages above the poverty line. The economic divide was most acute for African Americans and Latinos, one-third of whom qualified as poor.<\/p>\n

    The triumph of the right proved incomplete. The number of government employees actually increased under Reagan. With more than 80 percent of the federal budget committed to defense, entitlement programs, and interest on the national debt, the right\u2019s goal of deficit elimination floundered for lack of substantial areas to cut.18<\/sup><\/a> Between 1980 and 1989 the national debt rose from $914 billion to $2.7 trillion.19<\/sup><\/a> Despite steep tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy, the overall tax burden of the American public basically remained unchanged. Moreover, so-called regressive taxes on payroll and certain goods actually increased the tax burden on low- and middle-income Americans. Finally, Reagan slowed but failed to vanquish the five-decade legacy of economic liberalism. Most New Deal and Great Society proved durable. Government still offered its neediest citizens a safety net, if a now continually shrinking one.<\/p>\n

    Yet the discourse of American politics had irrevocably changed. The preeminence of conservative political ideas grew ever more pronounced, even when Democrats controlled Congress or the White House. In response to the conservative mood of the country, the Democratic Party adapted its own message to accommodate many of the Republicans\u2019 Reagan-era ideas and innovations. The United States was on a rightward path.<\/p>\n

    Notes<\/h4>\n
      \n
    1. Sean Wilentz, The Age of Reagan: A History, 1974\u20132008<\/em> (New York: HarperCollins, 2008), 163. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    2. Lou Cannon, \u201cPresident Calls for \u2018Crusade\u2019: Reagan Proposes Plan to Counter Soviet Challenge,\u201d Washington Post<\/em>, June 9, 1982, A1. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    3. Conservative newspaper columnist Charles Krauthammer coined the phrase. See Wilentz, Age of Reagan<\/em>, 157. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    4. James T. Patterson, Restless Giant: The United States from Watergate to Bush v. Gore<\/em> (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005), 205. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    5. Laura Kalman, Right Star Rising: A New Politics, 1974\u20131980 <\/em>(New York: Norton, 2010), 166\u2013167. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    6. Ronald Reagan, \u201cAddress to the Nation on United States Policy in Central America,\u201d May 9, 1984, http:\/\/www.reagan.utexas.edu\/archives\/speeches\/1984\/50984h.htm.. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    7. Frances Fitzgerald, Way out There in the Blue: Reagan, Star Wars, and the End of the Cold War<\/em> (New York: Simon and Schuster, 2000), 205. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    8. Ronald Reagan, \u201cRemarks at the Annual Dinner of the Conservative Political Action Conference,\u201d March 1, 1985, http:\/\/www.presidency.ucsb.edu\/ws\/?pid=38274. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    9. Lou Cannon, \u201cReagan Challenges Soviets to Dismantle Berlin Wall: Aides Disappointed at Crowd\u2019s Lukewarm Reception,\u201d Washington Post<\/em>, June 13, 1987, A1. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    10. Patterson, Restless Giant<\/em>, 163. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    11. Ibid., 163. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    12. Ibid., 163. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    13. Bruce J. Schulman and Julian Zelizer, eds., Rightward Bound: Making America Conservative in the 1970s<\/em> (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2008), 32. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    14. Patterson, Restless Giant<\/em>, 186. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    15. Ibid., 164. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    16. Ibid., 166. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    17. William Chafe, The Unfinished Journey: America Since World War II<\/em> (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), 488. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    18. Jacobs and Zelizer, Conservatives in Power<\/em>, 31. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    19. Patterson, Restless Giant<\/em>, 158. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":101,"menu_order":10,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-286","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":36,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1220ushistsincecivilwar\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/286","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1220ushistsincecivilwar\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1220ushistsincecivilwar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1220ushistsincecivilwar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/101"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1220ushistsincecivilwar\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/286\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":743,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1220ushistsincecivilwar\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/286\/revisions\/743"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1220ushistsincecivilwar\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/36"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1220ushistsincecivilwar\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/286\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1220ushistsincecivilwar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=286"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1220ushistsincecivilwar\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=286"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1220ushistsincecivilwar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=286"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1220ushistsincecivilwar\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=286"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}