{"id":263,"date":"2023-03-13T17:29:53","date_gmt":"2023-03-13T17:29:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1220ushistsincecivilwar\/chapter\/module-5-15\/"},"modified":"2023-04-28T20:00:42","modified_gmt":"2023-04-28T20:00:42","slug":"module-5-15","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1220ushistsincecivilwar\/chapter\/module-5-15\/","title":{"raw":"5.15 The Strain of Vietnam at home and abroad","rendered":"5.15 The Strain of Vietnam at home and abroad"},"content":{"raw":"
\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"700\"]\"Photograph Vietnam War protestors at the March on the Pentagon. Lyndon B. Johnson Library via Wikimedia<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\nPerhaps no single issue contributed more to public disillusionment than the Vietnam War. As the war deteriorated, the Johnson administration escalated American involvement by deploying hundreds of thousands of troops to prevent the communist takeover of the south. Stalemates, body counts, hazy war aims, and the draft catalyzed an antiwar movement and triggered protests throughout the United States and Europe. With no end in sight, protesters burned draft cards, refused to pay income taxes, occupied government buildings, and delayed trains loaded with war materials. By 1967, antiwar demonstrations were drawing hundreds of thousands. In one protest, hundreds were arrested after surrounding the Pentagon.1<\/sup><\/a>\r\n\r\nVietnam was the first \u201cliving room war.\u201d2<\/sup><\/a> Television, print media, and open access to the battlefield provided unprecedented coverage of the conflict\u2019s brutality. Americans confronted grisly images of casualties and atrocities. In 1965, CBS Evening News<\/em> aired a segment in which U.S. Marines burned the South Vietnamese village of Cam Ne with little apparent regard for the lives of its occupants, who had been accused of aiding Vietcong guerrillas. President Johnson berated the head of CBS, yelling over the phone, \u201cYour boys just shat on the American flag.\u201d3<\/sup><\/a>\r\n\r\nWhile the U.S. government imposed no formal censorship on the press during Vietnam, the White House and military nevertheless used press briefings and interviews to paint a deceptive image of the war. The United States was winning the war, officials claimed. They cited numbers of enemies killed, villages secured, and South Vietnamese troops trained. However, American journalists in Vietnam quickly realized the hollowness of such claims (the press referred to afternoon press briefings in Saigon as \u201cthe Five o\u2019Clock Follies\u201d).4<\/sup><\/a> Editors frequently toned down their reporters\u2019 pessimism, often citing conflicting information received from their own sources, who were typically government officials. But the evidence of a stalemate mounted.\r\n\r\nStories like CBS\u2019s Cam Ne piece exposed a credibility gap, the yawning chasm between the claims of official sources and the increasingly evident reality on the ground in Vietnam.5<\/sup><\/a> Nothing did more to expose this gap than the 1968 Tet Offensive. In January, communist forces attacked more than one hundred American and South Vietnamese sites throughout South Vietnam, including the American embassy in Saigon. While U.S. forces repulsed the attack and inflicted heavy casualties on the Vietcong, Tet demonstrated that despite the repeated claims of administration officials, the enemy could still strike at will anywhere in the country, even after years of war. Subsequent stories and images eroded public trust even further. In 1969, investigative reporter Seymour Hersh revealed that U.S. troops had raped and\/or massacred hundreds of civilians in the village of My Lai.6<\/sup><\/a> Three years later, Americans cringed at Nick Ut\u2019s wrenching photograph of a naked Vietnamese child fleeing an American napalm attack. More and more American voices came out against the war.\r\n\r\nReeling from the war\u2019s growing unpopularity, on March 31, 1968, President Johnson announced on national television that he would not seek reelection.7<\/sup><\/a> Eugene McCarthy and Robert F. Kennedy unsuccessfully battled against Johnson\u2019s vice president, Hubert Humphrey, for the Democratic Party nomination (Kennedy was assassinated in June). At the Democratic Party\u2019s national convention in Chicago, local police brutally assaulted protesters on national television.\r\n\r\nFor many Americans, the violent clashes outside the convention hall reinforced their belief that civil society was unraveling. Republican challenger Richard Nixon played on these fears, running on a platform of \u201claw and order\u201d and a vague plan to end the war. Well aware of domestic pressure to wind down the war, Nixon sought, on the one hand, to appease antiwar sentiment by promising to phase out the draft, train South Vietnamese forces to assume more responsibility for the war effort, and gradually withdraw American troops. Nixon and his advisors called it \u201cVietnamization.\u201d8<\/sup><\/a> At the same time, Nixon appealed to the so-called silent majority of Americans who still supported the war (and opposed the antiwar movement) by calling for an \u201chonorable\u201d end to U.S. involvement\u2014what he later called \u201cpeace with honor.\u201d9<\/sup><\/a> He narrowly edged out Humphrey in the fall\u2019s election.\r\n\r\nPublic assurances of American withdrawal, however, masked a dramatic escalation of conflict. Looking to incentivize peace talks, Nixon pursued a \u201cmadman strategy\u201d of attacking communist supply lines across Laos and Cambodia, hoping to convince the North Vietnamese that he would do anything to stop the war.10<\/sup><\/a> Conducted without public knowledge or congressional approval, the bombings failed to spur the peace process, and talks stalled before the American-imposed November 1969 deadline. News of the attacks renewed antiwar demonstrations. Police and National Guard troops killed six students in separate protests at Jackson State University in Mississippi, and, more famously, Kent State University in Ohio in 1970.\r\n\r\nAnother three years passed\u2014and another twenty thousand American troops died\u2014before an agreement was reached.11<\/sup><\/a> After Nixon threatened to withdraw all aid and guaranteed to enforce a treaty militarily, the North and South Vietnamese governments signed the Paris Peace Accords in January 1973, marking the official end of U.S. force commitment to the Vietnam War. Peace was tenuous, and when war resumed North Vietnamese troops quickly overwhelmed southern forces. By 1975, despite nearly a decade of direct American military engagement, Vietnam was united under a communist government.\r\n\r\nThe Vietnam War profoundly influenced domestic politics. Moreover, it poisoned many Americans\u2019 perceptions of their government and its role in the world. And yet, while the antiwar demonstrations attracted considerable media attention and stand today as a hallmark of the Sixties Counterculture, many Americans nevertheless continued to regard the war as just. Wary of the rapid social changes that reshaped American society in the 1960s and worried that antiwar protests threatened an already tenuous civil order, a growing number of Americans turned to conservatism.\r\n

The Crisis of 1968<\/h2>\r\nTo Americans in 1968, the country seemed to be unraveling. Martin Luther King Jr. was killed on April 4, 1968. He had been in Memphis to support striking sanitation workers. (Prophetically, he had reflected on his own mortality in a rally the night before. Confident that the Civil Rights Movement would succeed without him, he brushed away fears of death. \u201cI\u2019ve been to the mountaintop,\u201d he said, \u201cand I\u2019ve seen the promised land.\u201d).12<\/sup><\/a>The greatest leader in the American Civil Rights Movement was lost. Riots broke out in over a hundred American cities. Two months later, on June 6, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. was killed campaigning in California. He had represented the last hope of liberal idealists. Anger and disillusionment washed over the country.\r\n\r\nAs the Vietnam War descended ever deeper into a brutal stalemate and the Tet Offensive exposed the lies of the Johnson administration, students shut down college campuses and government facilities. Protests enveloped the nation.\r\n\r\nProtesters converged on the Democratic National Convention in Chicago at the end of August 1968, when a bitterly fractured Democratic Party gathered to assemble a passable platform and nominate a broadly acceptable presidential candidate. Demonstrators planned massive protests in Chicago\u2019s public spaces. Initial protests were peaceful, but the situation quickly soured as police issued stern threats and young people began to taunt and goad officials. Many of the assembled students had protest and sit-in experiences only in the relative safe havens of college campuses and were unprepared for Mayor Richard Daley\u2019s aggressive and heavily armed police force and National Guard troops in full riot gear. Attendees recounted vicious beatings at the hands of police and Guardsmen, but many young people\u2014convinced that much public sympathy could be won via images of brutality against unarmed protesters\u2014continued stoking the violence. Clashes spilled from the parks into city streets, and eventually the smell of tear gas penetrated the upper floors of the opulent hotels hosting Democratic delegates. Chicago\u2019s brutality overshadowed the convention and culminated in an internationally televised, violent standoff in front of the Hilton Hotel. \u201cThe whole world is watching,\u201d the protesters chanted. The Chicago riots encapsulated the growing sense that chaos now governed American life.\r\n\r\nFor many sixties\u2019 idealists, the violence of 1968 represented the death of a dream. Disorder and chaos overshadowed hope and progress. And for conservatives, it was confirmation of all of their fears and hesitations. Americans of 1968 turned their back on hope. They wanted peace. They wanted stability. They wanted \u201claw and order.\u201d\r\n\r\nAmerican politics moved right after Lyndon Johnson\u2019s administration, but Nixon\u2019s presidency was not a conservative revolution either. Politicians on both sides pursued moderate paths, but there were a lot anxieties and discontent under the surface. Cultural clashes persisted into the 70s, the economy crashed, and Americans began to recognize that the United States wasn\u2019t as heroic as it was once perceived. Many Americans felt nostalgic for simpler times and this continued into the 1970s.\r\n

Optional Viewing:<\/strong><\/h3>\r\nFilms for the Humanities and Sciences. Vietnam: America in the 20th Century. Produced by Media Rich Learning. 2003. Video,<\/a> 1:11:48.\r\n\r\n<\/div>\r\n