{"id":109,"date":"2023-03-06T23:47:54","date_gmt":"2023-03-06T23:47:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1210\/chapter\/module-4-5\/"},"modified":"2023-04-26T17:45:47","modified_gmt":"2023-04-26T17:45:47","slug":"module-4-5","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1210\/chapter\/module-4-5\/","title":{"raw":"4.5 Antebellum Reform","rendered":"4.5 Antebellum Reform"},"content":{"raw":"The era from the 1820s through the 1850s was also one of major social change, social movements, and social reform efforts in America, particularly in the northern states. The Second Great Awakening led to social and moral reform movements as reformers developed utopian communities (religious and secular), improved public education, advocated prison and asylum reform, and established mental hospitals. A number of the Antebellum reform movements were locked together, especially for female activists such as temperance (the prohibition of alcohol), women\u2019s rights, and the abolitionist movement to eliminate slavery. Perhaps the climatic moment for these efforts was the first Woman\u2019s Rights Convention at Seneca Falls, New York in 1848.<\/span>\r\n
\r\n\r\nAs noted above, some of the intellectual movements were not religious in nature. Transcendentalism led to a flourishing in a uniquely American form of literature and the arts, particularly in the Northeast. Ralph Waldo Emerson called for the recognition of a uniquely American culture. Authors such as Henry David Thoreau, James Fennimore Cooper (The Last of the Mohicans<\/em>), Margaret Fuller, and Louisa May Alcott (Little Women<\/em>) established a literary world in the Northeast. Eventually, former slaves such as Frederick Douglass and Harriet Jacobs contributed their narratives and voices to the cultural exchanges as well. In the form of painting, the Hudson River School portrayed the glories of the North and later the West. Popular culture, through magazines, novels, plays, and minstrel shows displayed the attitudes of society.\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"483\"]\"\u201cWoman\u2019s \u201cWoman\u2019s Rights Convention.\u201d National Reformer. 1848. \u202f Library of Congress<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n

Atlantic Origins of Reform<\/h2>\r\nThe reform movements that emerged in the United States during the first half of the nineteenth century were not American inventions. Instead, these movements were rooted in a transatlantic world where both sides of the ocean faced similar problems and together collaborated to find similar solutions. Many of the same factors that spurred American reformers to action\u2014such as urbanization, industrialization, and class struggle\u2014equally affected Europe. Reformers on both sides of the Atlantic visited and corresponded with one another. Exchanging ideas and building networks proved crucial to shared causes like abolition and women\u2019s rights.\r\n\r\nImprovements in transportation, including the introduction of the steamboat, canals, and railroads, connected people not just across the United States, but also with other like-minded reformers in Europe. (Ironically, the same technologies also helped ensure that even after the abolition of slavery in the British Empire, the British remained heavily invested in slavery, both directly and indirectly.) Equally important, the reduction of publication costs created by new printing technologies in the 1830s allowed reformers to reach new audiences across the world.1<\/sup><\/a> Almost immediately after its publication in the United States, for instance, the escaped slave and abolitionist Frederick Douglass\u2019s autobiography was republished in Europe and translated into French and Dutch, galvanizing Douglass\u2019s supporters across the Atlantic.2<\/sup><\/a>\r\n\r\nSuch exchanges began as part of the larger processes of colonialism and empire building. Missionary organizations from the colonial era had created many of these transatlantic links. The Atlantic travel of major figures during the First Great Awakening such as George Whitefield had built enduring networks. These networks changed as a result of the American Revolution but still revealed spiritual and personal connections between religious individuals and organizations in the United States and Great Britain. These connections can be seen in multiple areas. Mission work continued to be a joint effort, with American and European missionary societies in close correspondence throughout the early nineteenth century, as they coordinated domestic and foreign evangelistic missions. The transportation and print revolutions meant that news of British missionary efforts in India and Tahiti could be quickly printed in American religious periodicals, galvanizing American efforts to evangelize Native Americans, frontier settlers, immigrant groups, and even people overseas.\r\n\r\nIn addition to missions, antislavery work had a decidedly transatlantic cast from its very beginnings. American Quakers began to question slavery as early as the late seventeenth century and worked with British reformers in the successful campaign that ended the slave trade.3<\/sup><\/a> Before, during, and after the Revolution, many Americans continued to admire European thinkers. Influence extended both east and west. By foregrounding questions about rights, the American Revolution helped inspire British abolitionists, who in turn offered support to their American counterparts. American antislavery activists developed close relationships with abolitionists on the other side of the Atlantic, such as Thomas Clarkson, Daniel O\u2019Connell, and Joseph Sturge. Prominent American abolitionists such as Theodore Dwight Weld, Lucretia Mott, and William Lloyd Garrison were converted to the antislavery idea of immediatism\u2014that is, the demand for emancipation without delay\u2014by British abolitionists Elizabeth Heyrick and Charles Stuart.4<\/sup><\/a> Although Anglo-American anti-slavery networks reached back to the late eighteenth century, they dramatically grew in support and strength over the antebellum period, as evidenced by the General Anti-Slavery Convention of 1840. This antislavery delegation consisted of more than five hundred abolitionists, mostly coming from France, England, and the United States. All met together in England, united by their common goal of ending slavery in their time. Although abolitionism was not the largest American reform movement of the antebellum period (that honor belongs to temperance), it did foster greater cooperation among reformers in England and the United States.\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"700\"]\"This This enormous painting documents the 1840 convention of the British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society, established by both American and English anti-slavery activists to promote worldwide abolition. Benjamin Haydon, The Anti-Slavery Society Convention, 1840. \u202f Wikimedia<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\nIn the course of their abolitionist activities, many American women began to establish contact with their counterparts across the Atlantic, each group penning articles and contributing material support to the others\u2019 antislavery publications and fundraisers. The bonds between British and American reformers can be traced throughout the many social improvement projects of the nineteenth century. Transatlantic cooperation galvanized efforts to reform individuals\u2019 and societies\u2019 relationships to alcohol, labor, religion, education, commerce, and land ownership. This cooperation stemmed from the recognition that social problems on both sides of the Atlantic were strikingly similar. Atlantic activists helped American reformers conceptualize themselves as part of a worldwide moral mission to attack social ills and spread the gospel of Christianity.\r\n

The Benevolent Empire<\/h3>\r\nAfter religious disestablishment, citizens of the United States faced a dilemma: how to cultivate a moral and virtuous public without aid from state-sponsored religion. Most Americans agreed that a good and moral citizenry was essential for the national project to succeed, but many shared the perception that society\u2019s moral foundation was weakening. Narratives of moral and social decline, known as jeremiads, had long been embedded in Protestant story-telling traditions, but jeremiads took on new urgency in the antebellum period. In the years immediately following disestablishment, \u201ctraditional\u201d Protestant Christianity was at low tide, while the Industrial Revolution and the spread of capitalism had led to a host of social problems associated with cities and commerce. The Second Great Awakening was in part a spiritual response to such changes, revitalizing Christian spirits through the promise of salvation. The revivals also provided an institutional antidote to the insecurities of a rapidly changing world by inspiring an immense and widespread movement for social reform. Growing directly out of nineteenth-century revivalism, reform societies proliferated throughout the United States between 1815 and 1861, melding religion and reform into a powerful force in American culture known as the benevolent empire<\/em>.\r\n\r\nThe benevolent empire departed from revivalism\u2019s early populism, as middle-class ministers dominated the leadership of antebellum reform societies. Because of the economic forces of the market revolution, middle-class evangelicals had the time and resources to devote to reform campaigns. Often, their reforms focused on creating and maintaining respectable middle-class culture throughout the United States. Middle-class women, in particular, played a leading role in reform activity. They became increasingly responsible for the moral maintenance of their homes and communities, and their leadership signaled a dramatic departure from previous generations when such prominent roles for ordinary women would have been unthinkable.5<\/sup><\/a>\r\n\r\nDifferent forces within evangelical Protestantism combined to encourage reform. One of the great lights of benevolent reform was Charles Grandison Finney, the radical revivalist, who promoted a movement known as \u201cperfectionism.\u201d Premised on the belief that truly redeemed Christians would be motivated to live free of sin and reflect the perfection of God himself, his wildly popular revivals encouraged his converted followers to join reform movements and create God\u2019s kingdom on earth. The idea of \u201cdisinterested benevolence\u201d also turned many evangelicals toward reform. Preachers championing disinterested benevolence argued that true Christianity requires that a person give up self-love in favor of loving others. Though perfectionism and disinterested benevolence were the most prominent forces encouraging benevolent societies, some preachers achieved the same end in their advocacy of postmillennialism. In this worldview, Christ\u2019s return was foretold to occur after humanity had enjoyed one thousand years\u2019 peace, and it was the duty of converted Christians to improve the world around them in order to pave the way for Christ\u2019s redeeming return. Though ideological and theological issues like these divided Protestants into more and more sects, church leaders often worked on an interdenominational basis to establish benevolent societies and draw their followers into the work of social reform.\r\n\r\nUnder the leadership of preachers and ministers, reform societies attacked many social problems. Those concerned about drinking could join temperance societies; other groups focused on eradicating dueling and gambling. Evangelical reformers might support home or foreign missions or Bible and tract societies. Sabbatarians fought tirelessly to end nonreligious activity on the Sabbath. Moral reform societies sought to end prostitution and redeem \u201cfallen women.\u201d Over the course of the antebellum period, voluntary associations and benevolent activists also worked to reform bankruptcy laws, prison systems, insane asylums, labor laws, and education. They built orphanages and free medical dispensaries and developed programs to provide professional services like social work, job placement, and day camps for children in the slums.\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"700\"]\"Illustration Eastern State Penitentiary changed the principles of imprisonment, focusing on reform rather than punishment. The structure itself used the panopticon surveillance system, and was widely copied by prison systems around the world. P.S: Duval and Co., The State Penitentiary for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 1855. \u202fWikimedia<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\nThese organizations often shared membership as individuals found themselves interested in a wide range of reform movements. On Anniversary Week, many of the major reform groups coordinated the schedules of their annual meetings in New York or Boston to allow individuals to attend multiple meetings in a single trip.6<\/sup><\/a>\r\n\r\nAmong all the social reform movements associated with the benevolent empire, the temperance crusade was the most successful. Championed by prominent preachers like Lyman Beecher, the movement\u2019s effort to curb the consumption of alcohol galvanized widespread support among the middle class. Alcohol consumption became a significant social issue after the American Revolution. Commercial distilleries produced readily available, cheap whiskey that was frequently more affordable than milk or beer and safer than water, and hard liquor became a staple beverage in many lower- and middle-class households. Consumption among adults skyrocketed in the early nineteenth century, and alcoholism had become an endemic problem across the United States by the 1820s. As alcoholism became an increasingly visible issue in towns and cities, most reformers escalated their efforts from advocating moderation in liquor consumption to full abstinence from all alcohol.\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"700\"]\"N. N. Currier, \u201cTree of Intemperance\u201d and \u201cTree of Temperance,\u201d 1849. Courtesy \u202fAmerican Antiquarian Society<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\nMany reformers saw intemperance as the biggest impediment to maintaining order and morality in the young republic. Temperance reformers saw a direct correlation between alcohol and other forms of vice and, most importantly, felt that it endangered family life. In 1826, evangelical ministers organized the American Temperance Society to help spread the crusade nationally. It supported lecture campaigns, produced temperance literature, and organized revivals specifically aimed at encouraging worshippers to give up the drink. It was so successful that within a decade, it established five thousand branches and grew to over a million members.7<\/sup><\/a> Temperance reformers pledged not to touch the bottle and canvassed their neighborhoods and towns to encourage others to join their \u201cCold Water Army.\u201d They also influenced lawmakers in several states to prohibit the sale of liquor.\r\n\r\nIn response to the perception that heavy drinking was associated with men who abused, abandoned, or neglected their family obligations, women formed a significant presence in societies dedicated to eradicating liquor. Temperance became a hallmark of middle-class respectability among both men and women and developed into a crusade with a visible class character. Temperance, like many other reform efforts, was championed by the middle class and threatened to intrude on the private lives of lower-class workers, many of whom were Irish Catholics. Such intrusions by the Protestant middle class exacerbated class, ethnic, and religious tensions. Still, while the temperance movement made less substantial inroads into lower-class workers\u2019 drinking culture, the movement was still a great success for reformers. In the 1840s, Americans drank half of what they had in the 1820s, and per capita consumption continued to decline over the next two decades.8<\/sup><\/a>\r\n\r\n \r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"700\"]\"Nathaniel Nathaniel Currier, \u201cThe Drunkard\u2019s Progress.\u201d 1846. \u202fWikimedia<\/a>.[\/caption]\r\n\r\nThough middle-class reformers worked tirelessly to cure all manner of social problems through institutional salvation and voluntary benevolent work, they regularly participated in religious organizations founded explicitly to address the spiritual mission at the core of evangelical Protestantism. In fact, for many reformers, it was actually the experience of evangelizing among the poor and seeing firsthand the rampant social issues plaguing life in the slums that first inspired them to get involved in benevolent reform projects. Modeling themselves on the British and Foreign Bible Society, formed in 1804 to spread Christian doctrine to the British working class, urban missionaries emphasized the importance of winning the world for Christ, one soul at a time. For example, the American Bible Society and the American Tract Society used the efficient new steam-powered printing press to distribute Bibles and evangelizing religious tracts throughout the United States. For example, the New York Religious Tract Society alone managed to distribute religious tracts to all but 388 of New York City\u2019s 28,383 families.9<\/sup><\/a> In places like Boston, New York, and Philadelphia, middle-class women also established groups specifically to canvass neighborhoods and bring the gospel to lower-class \u201cwards.\u201d\r\n\r\nSuch evangelical missions extended well beyond the urban landscape, however. Stirred by nationalism and moral purpose, evangelicals labored to make sure the word of God reached far-flung settlers on the new American frontier. The American Bible Society distributed thousands of Bibles to frontier areas where churches and clergy were scarce, while the American Home Missionary Society provided substantial financial assistance to frontier congregations struggling to achieve self-sufficiency. Missionaries worked to translate the Bible into Iroquois and other languages in order to more effectively evangelize Native American populations. As efficient printing technology and faster transportation facilitated new transatlantic and global connections, religious Americans also began to flex their missionary zeal on a global stage. In 1810, for example, Presbyterian and Congregationalist leaders established the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions to evangelize in India, Africa, East Asia, and the Pacific.10<\/sup><\/a>\r\n\r\nThe potent combination of social reform and evangelical mission at the heart of the nineteenth century\u2019s benevolent empire produced reform agendas and institutional changes that have reverberated through the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. By devoting their time to the moral uplift of their communities and the world at large, middle-class reformers created many of the largest and most influential organizations in the nation\u2019s history. For the optimistic, religiously motivated American, no problem seemed too great to solve.\r\n\r\nDifficulties arose, however, when the benevolent empire attempted to take up more explicitly political issues. The movement against American Indian removal was the first major example of this. Missionary work had first brought the Cherokee Nation to the attention of northeastern evangelicals in the early nineteenth century. Missionaries sent by the American Board and other groups sought to introduce Christianity and American cultural values to the Cherokee and celebrated when their efforts seemed to be met with success. Evangelicals proclaimed that the Cherokee were becoming \u201ccivilized,\u201d which could be seen in their adoption of a written language and of a constitution modeled on that of the U.S. government. Mission supporters were shocked, then, when the election of Andrew Jackson brought a new emphasis on the removal of Native Americans from the land east of the Mississippi River. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was met with fierce opposition from within the affected Native American communities as well as from the benevolent empire. Jeremiah Evarts, one of the leaders of the American Board, wrote a series of essays under the pen name William Penn urging Americans to oppose removal.11<\/sup><\/a> He used the religious and moral arguments of the mission movement but added a new layer of politics in his extensive discussion of the history of treaty law between the United States and Native Americans. This political shift was even more evident when American missionaries challenged Georgia state laws asserting sovereignty over Cherokee territory in the Supreme Court Case Worcester v. Georgia<\/em>.12<\/sup><\/a> Although the case was successful, the federal government did not enforce the Court\u2019s decision, and American Indian removal was accomplished through the Trail of Tears, the tragic, forced removal of Native Americans to territories west of the Mississippi River.\r\n\r\nAnti-removal activism was also notable for the entry of ordinary American women into political discourse. The first major petition campaign by American women focused on opposition to removal and was led (anonymously) by Catharine Beecher. Beecher was already a leader in the movement to reform women\u2019s education and came to her role in removal through her connections to the mission movement. Inspired by a meeting with Jeremiah Evarts, Beecher echoed his arguments from the William Penn letters in her appeal to American women.13<\/sup><\/a> Beecher called on women to petition the government to end the policy of American Indian removal. She used religious and moral arguments to justify women\u2019s entry into political discussion when it concerned an obviously moral cause. This effort was ultimately unsuccessful but still introduced the kinds of arguments that paved the way for women\u2019s political activism for abolitionism and women\u2019s rights. The divisions that the anti-removal campaign revealed became more dramatic with the next political cause of nineteenth-century reformers: abolitionism.\r\n

Notes<\/h4>\r\n
    \r\n \t
  1. Robert A. Gross and Mary Kelley, eds., A History of the Book in America: Volume 2: An Extensive Republic: Print Culture, and Society in the New Nation, 1790\u20131840<\/em> (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2010), 112. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  2. Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Written by Himself<\/em> (Boston: Anti-Slavery Office, 1845), http:\/\/docsouth.unc.edu\/neh\/douglass\/douglass.html. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  3. Christopher Leslie Brown, Moral Capital: Foundations of British Abolitionism<\/em> (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2012). \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  4. David Brion Davis, \u201cThe Emergence of Immediatism in British and American Antislavery Thought,\u201d Journal of American History<\/em> 49, no. 2 (September 1962): 209\u2013230. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  5. Lori D. Ginzberg, Women and the Work of Benevolence: Morality, Politics, and Class in the Nineteenth Century<\/em> (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990). \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  6. Michael P. Young, Bearing Witness Against Sin: The Evangelical Birth of the American Social Movement<\/em> (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006), 74\u201375. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  7. Milton A. Maxwell, \u201cWashingtonian Movement,\u201d Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol 11<\/em> (1950): 410. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  8. Jack S. Blocker, American Temperance Movements: Cycles of Reform<\/em> (Boston: Hall, 1989). \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  9. David Paul Nord, Faith in Reading: Religious Publishing and the Birth of Mass Media in America<\/em> (New York: Oxford University Press, 222), 85.\"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  10. Emily Conroy-Krutz, Christian Imperialism: Converting the World in the Early American Republic<\/em> (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2015). \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  11. Jeremiah Evarts, Essays on the Present Crisis in the Condition of the American Indians: First Published in the National Intelligencer, Under the Signature of William Penn <\/em>(Boston: Perkins and Marvin, 1829), http:\/\/eco.canadiana.ca\/view\/oocihm.51209\/3?r=0&s=1.\"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  12. Worcester v. Georgia<\/em> (1832), https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/supremecourt\/text\/31\/515. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n \t
  13. Catharine Beecher, \u201cCircular Addressed to the Benevolent Ladies of the U. States,\u201d December 25, 1829, in Theda Purdue and Michael D. Green, eds., The Cherokee Removal: A Brief History with Documents<\/em>, 2nd ed. (Boston: Bedford St. Martin\u2019s, 2005), 111\u2013114. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\r\n<\/ol>\r\n<\/div>","rendered":"

    The era from the 1820s through the 1850s was also one of major social change, social movements, and social reform efforts in America, particularly in the northern states. The Second Great Awakening led to social and moral reform movements as reformers developed utopian communities (religious and secular), improved public education, advocated prison and asylum reform, and established mental hospitals. A number of the Antebellum reform movements were locked together, especially for female activists such as temperance (the prohibition of alcohol), women\u2019s rights, and the abolitionist movement to eliminate slavery. Perhaps the climatic moment for these efforts was the first Woman\u2019s Rights Convention at Seneca Falls, New York in 1848.<\/span><\/p>\n

    \n

    As noted above, some of the intellectual movements were not religious in nature. Transcendentalism led to a flourishing in a uniquely American form of literature and the arts, particularly in the Northeast. Ralph Waldo Emerson called for the recognition of a uniquely American culture. Authors such as Henry David Thoreau, James Fennimore Cooper (The Last of the Mohicans<\/em>), Margaret Fuller, and Louisa May Alcott (Little Women<\/em>) established a literary world in the Northeast. Eventually, former slaves such as Frederick Douglass and Harriet Jacobs contributed their narratives and voices to the cultural exchanges as well. In the form of painting, the Hudson River School portrayed the glories of the North and later the West. Popular culture, through magazines, novels, plays, and minstrel shows displayed the attitudes of society.<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    \"\u201cWoman\u2019s
    \u201cWoman\u2019s Rights Convention.\u201d National Reformer. 1848. \u202f Library of Congress<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

    Atlantic Origins of Reform<\/h2>\n

    The reform movements that emerged in the United States during the first half of the nineteenth century were not American inventions. Instead, these movements were rooted in a transatlantic world where both sides of the ocean faced similar problems and together collaborated to find similar solutions. Many of the same factors that spurred American reformers to action\u2014such as urbanization, industrialization, and class struggle\u2014equally affected Europe. Reformers on both sides of the Atlantic visited and corresponded with one another. Exchanging ideas and building networks proved crucial to shared causes like abolition and women\u2019s rights.<\/p>\n

    Improvements in transportation, including the introduction of the steamboat, canals, and railroads, connected people not just across the United States, but also with other like-minded reformers in Europe. (Ironically, the same technologies also helped ensure that even after the abolition of slavery in the British Empire, the British remained heavily invested in slavery, both directly and indirectly.) Equally important, the reduction of publication costs created by new printing technologies in the 1830s allowed reformers to reach new audiences across the world.1<\/sup><\/a> Almost immediately after its publication in the United States, for instance, the escaped slave and abolitionist Frederick Douglass\u2019s autobiography was republished in Europe and translated into French and Dutch, galvanizing Douglass\u2019s supporters across the Atlantic.2<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

    Such exchanges began as part of the larger processes of colonialism and empire building. Missionary organizations from the colonial era had created many of these transatlantic links. The Atlantic travel of major figures during the First Great Awakening such as George Whitefield had built enduring networks. These networks changed as a result of the American Revolution but still revealed spiritual and personal connections between religious individuals and organizations in the United States and Great Britain. These connections can be seen in multiple areas. Mission work continued to be a joint effort, with American and European missionary societies in close correspondence throughout the early nineteenth century, as they coordinated domestic and foreign evangelistic missions. The transportation and print revolutions meant that news of British missionary efforts in India and Tahiti could be quickly printed in American religious periodicals, galvanizing American efforts to evangelize Native Americans, frontier settlers, immigrant groups, and even people overseas.<\/p>\n

    In addition to missions, antislavery work had a decidedly transatlantic cast from its very beginnings. American Quakers began to question slavery as early as the late seventeenth century and worked with British reformers in the successful campaign that ended the slave trade.3<\/sup><\/a> Before, during, and after the Revolution, many Americans continued to admire European thinkers. Influence extended both east and west. By foregrounding questions about rights, the American Revolution helped inspire British abolitionists, who in turn offered support to their American counterparts. American antislavery activists developed close relationships with abolitionists on the other side of the Atlantic, such as Thomas Clarkson, Daniel O\u2019Connell, and Joseph Sturge. Prominent American abolitionists such as Theodore Dwight Weld, Lucretia Mott, and William Lloyd Garrison were converted to the antislavery idea of immediatism\u2014that is, the demand for emancipation without delay\u2014by British abolitionists Elizabeth Heyrick and Charles Stuart.4<\/sup><\/a> Although Anglo-American anti-slavery networks reached back to the late eighteenth century, they dramatically grew in support and strength over the antebellum period, as evidenced by the General Anti-Slavery Convention of 1840. This antislavery delegation consisted of more than five hundred abolitionists, mostly coming from France, England, and the United States. All met together in England, united by their common goal of ending slavery in their time. Although abolitionism was not the largest American reform movement of the antebellum period (that honor belongs to temperance), it did foster greater cooperation among reformers in England and the United States.<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    \"This
    This enormous painting documents the 1840 convention of the British and Foreign Anti-Slavery Society, established by both American and English anti-slavery activists to promote worldwide abolition. Benjamin Haydon, The Anti-Slavery Society Convention, 1840. \u202f Wikimedia<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

    In the course of their abolitionist activities, many American women began to establish contact with their counterparts across the Atlantic, each group penning articles and contributing material support to the others\u2019 antislavery publications and fundraisers. The bonds between British and American reformers can be traced throughout the many social improvement projects of the nineteenth century. Transatlantic cooperation galvanized efforts to reform individuals\u2019 and societies\u2019 relationships to alcohol, labor, religion, education, commerce, and land ownership. This cooperation stemmed from the recognition that social problems on both sides of the Atlantic were strikingly similar. Atlantic activists helped American reformers conceptualize themselves as part of a worldwide moral mission to attack social ills and spread the gospel of Christianity.<\/p>\n

    The Benevolent Empire<\/h3>\n

    After religious disestablishment, citizens of the United States faced a dilemma: how to cultivate a moral and virtuous public without aid from state-sponsored religion. Most Americans agreed that a good and moral citizenry was essential for the national project to succeed, but many shared the perception that society\u2019s moral foundation was weakening. Narratives of moral and social decline, known as jeremiads, had long been embedded in Protestant story-telling traditions, but jeremiads took on new urgency in the antebellum period. In the years immediately following disestablishment, \u201ctraditional\u201d Protestant Christianity was at low tide, while the Industrial Revolution and the spread of capitalism had led to a host of social problems associated with cities and commerce. The Second Great Awakening was in part a spiritual response to such changes, revitalizing Christian spirits through the promise of salvation. The revivals also provided an institutional antidote to the insecurities of a rapidly changing world by inspiring an immense and widespread movement for social reform. Growing directly out of nineteenth-century revivalism, reform societies proliferated throughout the United States between 1815 and 1861, melding religion and reform into a powerful force in American culture known as the benevolent empire<\/em>.<\/p>\n

    The benevolent empire departed from revivalism\u2019s early populism, as middle-class ministers dominated the leadership of antebellum reform societies. Because of the economic forces of the market revolution, middle-class evangelicals had the time and resources to devote to reform campaigns. Often, their reforms focused on creating and maintaining respectable middle-class culture throughout the United States. Middle-class women, in particular, played a leading role in reform activity. They became increasingly responsible for the moral maintenance of their homes and communities, and their leadership signaled a dramatic departure from previous generations when such prominent roles for ordinary women would have been unthinkable.5<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

    Different forces within evangelical Protestantism combined to encourage reform. One of the great lights of benevolent reform was Charles Grandison Finney, the radical revivalist, who promoted a movement known as \u201cperfectionism.\u201d Premised on the belief that truly redeemed Christians would be motivated to live free of sin and reflect the perfection of God himself, his wildly popular revivals encouraged his converted followers to join reform movements and create God\u2019s kingdom on earth. The idea of \u201cdisinterested benevolence\u201d also turned many evangelicals toward reform. Preachers championing disinterested benevolence argued that true Christianity requires that a person give up self-love in favor of loving others. Though perfectionism and disinterested benevolence were the most prominent forces encouraging benevolent societies, some preachers achieved the same end in their advocacy of postmillennialism. In this worldview, Christ\u2019s return was foretold to occur after humanity had enjoyed one thousand years\u2019 peace, and it was the duty of converted Christians to improve the world around them in order to pave the way for Christ\u2019s redeeming return. Though ideological and theological issues like these divided Protestants into more and more sects, church leaders often worked on an interdenominational basis to establish benevolent societies and draw their followers into the work of social reform.<\/p>\n

    Under the leadership of preachers and ministers, reform societies attacked many social problems. Those concerned about drinking could join temperance societies; other groups focused on eradicating dueling and gambling. Evangelical reformers might support home or foreign missions or Bible and tract societies. Sabbatarians fought tirelessly to end nonreligious activity on the Sabbath. Moral reform societies sought to end prostitution and redeem \u201cfallen women.\u201d Over the course of the antebellum period, voluntary associations and benevolent activists also worked to reform bankruptcy laws, prison systems, insane asylums, labor laws, and education. They built orphanages and free medical dispensaries and developed programs to provide professional services like social work, job placement, and day camps for children in the slums.<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    \"Illustration
    Eastern State Penitentiary changed the principles of imprisonment, focusing on reform rather than punishment. The structure itself used the panopticon surveillance system, and was widely copied by prison systems around the world. P.S: Duval and Co., The State Penitentiary for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, 1855. \u202fWikimedia<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

    These organizations often shared membership as individuals found themselves interested in a wide range of reform movements. On Anniversary Week, many of the major reform groups coordinated the schedules of their annual meetings in New York or Boston to allow individuals to attend multiple meetings in a single trip.6<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

    Among all the social reform movements associated with the benevolent empire, the temperance crusade was the most successful. Championed by prominent preachers like Lyman Beecher, the movement\u2019s effort to curb the consumption of alcohol galvanized widespread support among the middle class. Alcohol consumption became a significant social issue after the American Revolution. Commercial distilleries produced readily available, cheap whiskey that was frequently more affordable than milk or beer and safer than water, and hard liquor became a staple beverage in many lower- and middle-class households. Consumption among adults skyrocketed in the early nineteenth century, and alcoholism had become an endemic problem across the United States by the 1820s. As alcoholism became an increasingly visible issue in towns and cities, most reformers escalated their efforts from advocating moderation in liquor consumption to full abstinence from all alcohol.<\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    \"N.
    N. Currier, \u201cTree of Intemperance\u201d and \u201cTree of Temperance,\u201d 1849. Courtesy \u202fAmerican Antiquarian Society<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

    Many reformers saw intemperance as the biggest impediment to maintaining order and morality in the young republic. Temperance reformers saw a direct correlation between alcohol and other forms of vice and, most importantly, felt that it endangered family life. In 1826, evangelical ministers organized the American Temperance Society to help spread the crusade nationally. It supported lecture campaigns, produced temperance literature, and organized revivals specifically aimed at encouraging worshippers to give up the drink. It was so successful that within a decade, it established five thousand branches and grew to over a million members.7<\/sup><\/a> Temperance reformers pledged not to touch the bottle and canvassed their neighborhoods and towns to encourage others to join their \u201cCold Water Army.\u201d They also influenced lawmakers in several states to prohibit the sale of liquor.<\/p>\n

    In response to the perception that heavy drinking was associated with men who abused, abandoned, or neglected their family obligations, women formed a significant presence in societies dedicated to eradicating liquor. Temperance became a hallmark of middle-class respectability among both men and women and developed into a crusade with a visible class character. Temperance, like many other reform efforts, was championed by the middle class and threatened to intrude on the private lives of lower-class workers, many of whom were Irish Catholics. Such intrusions by the Protestant middle class exacerbated class, ethnic, and religious tensions. Still, while the temperance movement made less substantial inroads into lower-class workers\u2019 drinking culture, the movement was still a great success for reformers. In the 1840s, Americans drank half of what they had in the 1820s, and per capita consumption continued to decline over the next two decades.8<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

     <\/p>\n

    \"Nathaniel
    Nathaniel Currier, \u201cThe Drunkard\u2019s Progress.\u201d 1846. \u202fWikimedia<\/a>.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

    Though middle-class reformers worked tirelessly to cure all manner of social problems through institutional salvation and voluntary benevolent work, they regularly participated in religious organizations founded explicitly to address the spiritual mission at the core of evangelical Protestantism. In fact, for many reformers, it was actually the experience of evangelizing among the poor and seeing firsthand the rampant social issues plaguing life in the slums that first inspired them to get involved in benevolent reform projects. Modeling themselves on the British and Foreign Bible Society, formed in 1804 to spread Christian doctrine to the British working class, urban missionaries emphasized the importance of winning the world for Christ, one soul at a time. For example, the American Bible Society and the American Tract Society used the efficient new steam-powered printing press to distribute Bibles and evangelizing religious tracts throughout the United States. For example, the New York Religious Tract Society alone managed to distribute religious tracts to all but 388 of New York City\u2019s 28,383 families.9<\/sup><\/a> In places like Boston, New York, and Philadelphia, middle-class women also established groups specifically to canvass neighborhoods and bring the gospel to lower-class \u201cwards.\u201d<\/p>\n

    Such evangelical missions extended well beyond the urban landscape, however. Stirred by nationalism and moral purpose, evangelicals labored to make sure the word of God reached far-flung settlers on the new American frontier. The American Bible Society distributed thousands of Bibles to frontier areas where churches and clergy were scarce, while the American Home Missionary Society provided substantial financial assistance to frontier congregations struggling to achieve self-sufficiency. Missionaries worked to translate the Bible into Iroquois and other languages in order to more effectively evangelize Native American populations. As efficient printing technology and faster transportation facilitated new transatlantic and global connections, religious Americans also began to flex their missionary zeal on a global stage. In 1810, for example, Presbyterian and Congregationalist leaders established the American Board of Commissioners for Foreign Missions to evangelize in India, Africa, East Asia, and the Pacific.10<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n

    The potent combination of social reform and evangelical mission at the heart of the nineteenth century\u2019s benevolent empire produced reform agendas and institutional changes that have reverberated through the twentieth and twenty-first centuries. By devoting their time to the moral uplift of their communities and the world at large, middle-class reformers created many of the largest and most influential organizations in the nation\u2019s history. For the optimistic, religiously motivated American, no problem seemed too great to solve.<\/p>\n

    Difficulties arose, however, when the benevolent empire attempted to take up more explicitly political issues. The movement against American Indian removal was the first major example of this. Missionary work had first brought the Cherokee Nation to the attention of northeastern evangelicals in the early nineteenth century. Missionaries sent by the American Board and other groups sought to introduce Christianity and American cultural values to the Cherokee and celebrated when their efforts seemed to be met with success. Evangelicals proclaimed that the Cherokee were becoming \u201ccivilized,\u201d which could be seen in their adoption of a written language and of a constitution modeled on that of the U.S. government. Mission supporters were shocked, then, when the election of Andrew Jackson brought a new emphasis on the removal of Native Americans from the land east of the Mississippi River. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was met with fierce opposition from within the affected Native American communities as well as from the benevolent empire. Jeremiah Evarts, one of the leaders of the American Board, wrote a series of essays under the pen name William Penn urging Americans to oppose removal.11<\/sup><\/a> He used the religious and moral arguments of the mission movement but added a new layer of politics in his extensive discussion of the history of treaty law between the United States and Native Americans. This political shift was even more evident when American missionaries challenged Georgia state laws asserting sovereignty over Cherokee territory in the Supreme Court Case Worcester v. Georgia<\/em>.12<\/sup><\/a> Although the case was successful, the federal government did not enforce the Court\u2019s decision, and American Indian removal was accomplished through the Trail of Tears, the tragic, forced removal of Native Americans to territories west of the Mississippi River.<\/p>\n

    Anti-removal activism was also notable for the entry of ordinary American women into political discourse. The first major petition campaign by American women focused on opposition to removal and was led (anonymously) by Catharine Beecher. Beecher was already a leader in the movement to reform women\u2019s education and came to her role in removal through her connections to the mission movement. Inspired by a meeting with Jeremiah Evarts, Beecher echoed his arguments from the William Penn letters in her appeal to American women.13<\/sup><\/a> Beecher called on women to petition the government to end the policy of American Indian removal. She used religious and moral arguments to justify women\u2019s entry into political discussion when it concerned an obviously moral cause. This effort was ultimately unsuccessful but still introduced the kinds of arguments that paved the way for women\u2019s political activism for abolitionism and women\u2019s rights. The divisions that the anti-removal campaign revealed became more dramatic with the next political cause of nineteenth-century reformers: abolitionism.<\/p>\n

    Notes<\/h4>\n
      \n
    1. Robert A. Gross and Mary Kelley, eds., A History of the Book in America: Volume 2: An Extensive Republic: Print Culture, and Society in the New Nation, 1790\u20131840<\/em> (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2010), 112. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    2. Frederick Douglass, Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, Written by Himself<\/em> (Boston: Anti-Slavery Office, 1845), http:\/\/docsouth.unc.edu\/neh\/douglass\/douglass.html. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    3. Christopher Leslie Brown, Moral Capital: Foundations of British Abolitionism<\/em> (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 2012). \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    4. David Brion Davis, \u201cThe Emergence of Immediatism in British and American Antislavery Thought,\u201d Journal of American History<\/em> 49, no. 2 (September 1962): 209\u2013230. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    5. Lori D. Ginzberg, Women and the Work of Benevolence: Morality, Politics, and Class in the Nineteenth Century<\/em> (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1990). \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    6. Michael P. Young, Bearing Witness Against Sin: The Evangelical Birth of the American Social Movement<\/em> (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2006), 74\u201375. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    7. Milton A. Maxwell, \u201cWashingtonian Movement,\u201d Quarterly Journal of Studies on Alcohol 11<\/em> (1950): 410. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    8. Jack S. Blocker, American Temperance Movements: Cycles of Reform<\/em> (Boston: Hall, 1989). \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    9. David Paul Nord, Faith in Reading: Religious Publishing and the Birth of Mass Media in America<\/em> (New York: Oxford University Press, 222), 85.\"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    10. Emily Conroy-Krutz, Christian Imperialism: Converting the World in the Early American Republic<\/em> (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2015). \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    11. Jeremiah Evarts, Essays on the Present Crisis in the Condition of the American Indians: First Published in the National Intelligencer, Under the Signature of William Penn <\/em>(Boston: Perkins and Marvin, 1829), http:\/\/eco.canadiana.ca\/view\/oocihm.51209\/3?r=0&s=1.\"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    12. Worcester v. Georgia<\/em> (1832), https:\/\/www.law.cornell.edu\/supremecourt\/text\/31\/515. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n
    13. Catharine Beecher, \u201cCircular Addressed to the Benevolent Ladies of the U. States,\u201d December 25, 1829, in Theda Purdue and Michael D. Green, eds., The Cherokee Removal: A Brief History with Documents<\/em>, 2nd ed. (Boston: Bedford St. Martin\u2019s, 2005), 111\u2013114. \"image\"<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"author":101,"menu_order":35,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"chapter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"class_list":["post-109","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry"],"part":250,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1210\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/109","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1210\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1210\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1210\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/101"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1210\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/109\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":630,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1210\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/109\/revisions\/630"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1210\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/250"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1210\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/109\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1210\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=109"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1210\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=109"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1210\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=109"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/ppschis1210\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=109"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}