Have you ever stopped to consider why the universe exists at all? What explains it? What caused it to come into being? Is it comprised of one essential kind of thing, or is it a combination of multiple substances? Is the universe entirely physical in nature, or is it comprised entirely of thought and ideas, of non-physical reality? Or is it somehow both of these? Is change a basic fact of the universe, or is change an illusion? What is time? Is it real? What is space?<\/p>\r\n
And what are you? Are you a non-physical mind in a physical body? Or are you made entirely of physical particles and energy? Are your thoughts to be understood as mental processes, or are they simply \u201cbrain events\u201d? If we are entirely physical beings, can we have any freedom whatsoever? In physical systems, every event is caused by a prior event. Can there be genuine freedom if every brain event you have is inevitable? Yet if there is no freedom, how can we be held accountable for what our \u201cbrains make us do\u201d?<\/p>\r\n
These are all questions for the field of Metaphysics. Metaphysics<\/strong> is the branch of philosophy that explores questions about what is real, about the nature of existence. Aristotle called it the \"first philosophy,\" the term itself comes from the Greek ta meta ta ph<\/em>y<\/em>sika<\/em>, i.e., \u2018the things that come after Aristotle\u2019s book on Physics\u2019.<\/p>\r\n According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,<\/p>\r\n The word \u2018metaphysics\u2019 is notoriously hard to define. Twentieth-century coinages like \u2018meta-language\u2019 and \u2018meta philosophy\u2019 encourage the impression that metaphysics is a study that somehow \u201cgoes beyond\u201d physics, a study devoted to matters that transcend the mundane concerns of Newton and Einstein, and Heisenberg. This impression is mistaken. The word \u2018metaphysics\u2019 is derived from a collective title of the fourteen books by Aristotle that we currently think of as making up Aristotle's Metaphysics<\/em>. Aristotle himself did not know the word. (He had four names for the branch of philosophy that is the subject matter of Metaphysics: \u2018first philosophy\u2019, \u2018first science\u2019, \u2018wisdom\u2019, and \u2018theology\u2019.) At least one hundred years after Aristotle's death, an editor of his works (in all probability, Andronicus of Rhodes) titled those fourteen books \u201cTa meta ta ph<\/em>y<\/em>sika<\/em>\u201d\u2014 \u201cafter the physicals\u201d or \u201cthe ones after the physical ones\u201d\u2014the \u201cphysical ones\u201d being the books contained in what we now call Aristotle's Physics<\/em>. The title was probably meant to warn students of Aristotle's philosophy that they should attempt metaphysics only after they had mastered \u201cthe physical ones\u201d, the books about nature or the natural world\u2014that is to say, about change, for change is the defining feature of the natural world.<\/p>\r\n This is the probable meaning of the title because\u00a0Metaphysics<\/em> is about things that do not change. In one place, Aristotle identifies the subject matter of first philosophy as \u201cbeing as such\u201d, and, in another as \u201cfirst causes\u201d. It is a nice\u2014and vexing\u2014question what the connection between these two definitions is. Perhaps this is the answer: The unchanging first causes have nothing but being in common with the mutable things they cause. Like us and the objects of our experience\u2014they are, and there the resemblance ceases.\u00a0 (van Inwagen & Sullivan, SEP, \u201cMetaphysics<\/a>,\u201d Section 1)<\/p>\r\n At any rate, metaphysics is typically understood as the branch of philosophy that explores questions about what is real and what exists. Metaphysics asks questions about the fundamental nature of reality, about what reality \"is\" at its most basic level, and about the nature of time, space, and causality. As noted above, it asks whether reality is entirely physical in its makeup, entirely non-physical, or some combination of the two. So too, one of the most persistent metaphysical questions is whether God exists. That question ties so closely into other issues in philosophical theology, however, that it will be discussed in our chapter on the philosophy of religion. But as we will see below, there is much to consider in metaphysics, even apart from questions about the divine.<\/p>\r\n Leonardo DiCaprio & The Nature of Reality: Crash Course Philosophy #4<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\r\n[embed]https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/IV-8YsyghbU[\/embed]\r\n Or watch the video here<\/a><\/p>\r\n \r\n Works Cited<\/strong><\/p>\r\n CrashCourse. Leonardo\u00a0DiCaprio &\u00a0The Nature of Reality: Crash Course Philosophy #4<\/i>. YouTube<\/i>, YouTube, 29 Fed. 2016, https:\/\/youtu.be\/MLKrmw906TM<\/a>. Accessed 12 Apr. 2022.<\/p>","rendered":" Have you ever stopped to consider why the universe exists at all? What explains it? What caused it to come into being? Is it comprised of one essential kind of thing, or is it a combination of multiple substances? Is the universe entirely physical in nature, or is it comprised entirely of thought and ideas, of non-physical reality? Or is it somehow both of these? Is change a basic fact of the universe, or is change an illusion? What is time? Is it real? What is space?<\/p>\n And what are you? Are you a non-physical mind in a physical body? Or are you made entirely of physical particles and energy? Are your thoughts to be understood as mental processes, or are they simply \u201cbrain events\u201d? If we are entirely physical beings, can we have any freedom whatsoever? In physical systems, every event is caused by a prior event. Can there be genuine freedom if every brain event you have is inevitable? Yet if there is no freedom, how can we be held accountable for what our \u201cbrains make us do\u201d?<\/p>\n These are all questions for the field of Metaphysics. Metaphysics<\/strong> is the branch of philosophy that explores questions about what is real, about the nature of existence. Aristotle called it the “first philosophy,” the term itself comes from the Greek ta meta ta ph<\/em>y<\/em>sika<\/em>, i.e., \u2018the things that come after Aristotle\u2019s book on Physics\u2019.<\/p>\n According to the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy,<\/p>\n The word \u2018metaphysics\u2019 is notoriously hard to define. Twentieth-century coinages like \u2018meta-language\u2019 and \u2018meta philosophy\u2019 encourage the impression that metaphysics is a study that somehow \u201cgoes beyond\u201d physics, a study devoted to matters that transcend the mundane concerns of Newton and Einstein, and Heisenberg. This impression is mistaken. The word \u2018metaphysics\u2019 is derived from a collective title of the fourteen books by Aristotle that we currently think of as making up Aristotle’s Metaphysics<\/em>. Aristotle himself did not know the word. (He had four names for the branch of philosophy that is the subject matter of Metaphysics: \u2018first philosophy\u2019, \u2018first science\u2019, \u2018wisdom\u2019, and \u2018theology\u2019.) At least one hundred years after Aristotle’s death, an editor of his works (in all probability, Andronicus of Rhodes) titled those fourteen books \u201cTa meta ta ph<\/em>y<\/em>sika<\/em>\u201d\u2014 \u201cafter the physicals\u201d or \u201cthe ones after the physical ones\u201d\u2014the \u201cphysical ones\u201d being the books contained in what we now call Aristotle’s Physics<\/em>. The title was probably meant to warn students of Aristotle’s philosophy that they should attempt metaphysics only after they had mastered \u201cthe physical ones\u201d, the books about nature or the natural world\u2014that is to say, about change, for change is the defining feature of the natural world.<\/p>\n This is the probable meaning of the title because\u00a0Metaphysics<\/em> is about things that do not change. In one place, Aristotle identifies the subject matter of first philosophy as \u201cbeing as such\u201d, and, in another as \u201cfirst causes\u201d. It is a nice\u2014and vexing\u2014question what the connection between these two definitions is. Perhaps this is the answer: The unchanging first causes have nothing but being in common with the mutable things they cause. Like us and the objects of our experience\u2014they are, and there the resemblance ceases.\u00a0 (van Inwagen & Sullivan, SEP, \u201cMetaphysics<\/a>,\u201d Section 1)<\/p>\n At any rate, metaphysics is typically understood as the branch of philosophy that explores questions about what is real and what exists. Metaphysics asks questions about the fundamental nature of reality, about what reality “is” at its most basic level, and about the nature of time, space, and causality. As noted above, it asks whether reality is entirely physical in its makeup, entirely non-physical, or some combination of the two. So too, one of the most persistent metaphysical questions is whether God exists. That question ties so closely into other issues in philosophical theology, however, that it will be discussed in our chapter on the philosophy of religion. But as we will see below, there is much to consider in metaphysics, even apart from questions about the divine.<\/p>\n Leonardo DiCaprio & The Nature of Reality: Crash Course Philosophy #4<\/strong><\/span><\/p>\n