{"id":2851,"date":"2022-05-13T19:39:18","date_gmt":"2022-05-13T19:39:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/chapter\/8-2-a-brief-history-of-science-2\/"},"modified":"2024-01-15T17:16:46","modified_gmt":"2024-01-15T17:16:46","slug":"8-2-a-brief-history-of-science-2","status":"publish","type":"chapter","link":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/chapter\/8-2-a-brief-history-of-science-2\/","title":{"raw":"8.2 A Brief History of Science","rendered":"8.2 A Brief History of Science"},"content":{"raw":"<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\r\n\r\n<strong>LEARNING OBJECTIVES<\/strong>\r\n\r\n<hr \/>\r\n\r\nBy the end of this section you will discover:\r\n<ul>\r\n \t<li>A brief history of the development of science in Western culture.<\/li>\r\n<\/ul>\r\n<\/div>\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">Science in Ancient Mesopotamia<\/h3>\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"275\"]<img src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/65\/2022\/03\/image75-2-1.jpeg\" alt=\"Carving on a Mesopotamian Sarcophagus\" width=\"275\" height=\"183\" \/> A carving on a Mesopotamian Sarcophagus[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">The earliest roots of science can be traced to\u00a0Ancient Egypt\u00a0and\u00a0Mesopotamia\u00a0in around 3000 to 1200 BCE.\u00a0Although the words and concepts of \"science\" and \"nature\" were not part of the conceptual landscape at the time, the ancient Egyptians and Mesopotamians made contributions that would later find a place in Greek and medieval science: <strong>mathematics<\/strong>, <strong>astronomy<\/strong>, and <strong>medicine<\/strong>. Starting in around 3000 BCE, the ancient Egyptians developed a numbering system that was decimal in character and orientated their knowledge of geometry to solve practical problems such as those of surveyors and builders. They even developed an official calendar that contained twelve months, thirty days each, and five days at the end of the year. Based on the medical papyri written between 2500-1200 BCE, the ancient Egyptians believed that disease was mainly caused by the invasion of bodies by evil forces or spirits. Thus, in addition to drug treatments, healing therapies would involve prayer, incantation, and ritual.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">The ancient Mesopotamians used knowledge about the properties of various natural chemicals for manufacturing pottery, faience, glass, soap, metals, lime plaster, and waterproofing; they also studied animal physiology, anatomy, and behavior for divinatory purposes and made extensive records of the movements of astronomical objects for their study of astrology. The Mesopotamians had an intense interest in medicine and the earliest medical prescriptions appeared in Sumerian writing during the Third Dynasty of Ur (c. 2112 BCE \u2013 c. 2004 BCE). Nonetheless, the Mesopotamians seem to have had little interest in gathering information about the natural world for the mere sake of gathering information and mainly only studied scientific subjects which had obvious practical applications or immediate relevance to their religious system.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">Science in Classical antiquity<\/h3>\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"166\"]<img src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/65\/2024\/01\/image76-2-scaled-1.jpeg\" alt=\"A bust of Hippocrates\" width=\"166\" height=\"256\" \/> Hippocrates (460-375 BCE)[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">In\u00a0classical antiquity, there is no real ancient analog of a modern\u00a0scientist. Instead, well-educated, usually upper-class, and almost universally male individuals performed various investigations into nature whenever they could afford the time. \u00a0Before the invention or discovery of the\u00a0concept\u00a0of \"nature\" (ancient Greek\u00a0<em>physis<\/em>) by the\u00a0Pre-Socratic philosophers, the same words tend to be used to describe the\u00a0natural\u00a0\"way\" in which a plant grows, \u00a0and the \"way\" in which, for example, one tribe worships a particular god. For this reason, it is claimed these men were the first philosophers in the strict sense, and also the first people to clearly distinguish \"nature\" and \"convention.\" \u00a0<strong>Natural philosophy<\/strong>, the precursor of natural science, was thereby distinguished as the knowledge of nature and things that are true for every community, and the name of the specialized pursuit of such knowledge was philosophy \u2013 the realm of the first philosopher-physicists. They were mainly speculators or theorists, particularly interested in astronomy. In contrast, trying to use knowledge of nature to imitate nature (artifice or technology, Greek\u00a0<em>techn\u0113<\/em>) was seen by classical scientists as a more appropriate interest for\u00a0artisans\u00a0of lower\u00a0social class..... The early\u00a0Greek philosophers\u00a0of the\u00a0Milesian school, which was founded by\u00a0Thales of Miletus\u00a0and later continued by his successors\u00a0Anaximander\u00a0and\u00a0Anaximenes, were the first to attempt to explain\u00a0natural phenomena\u00a0without relying on the\u00a0supernatural. \u00a0The\u00a0Pythagoreans\u00a0developed a complex number philosophy\u200aand contributed significantly to the development of mathematical science.\u200a\u00a0The\u00a0theory of atoms\u00a0was developed by the Greek philosopher\u00a0Leucippus\u00a0and his student\u00a0Democritus. The Greek doctor\u00a0Hippocrates\u00a0established the tradition of systematic medical science and is known as \"The Father of Medicine\".<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">A turning point in the history of early philosophical science was Socrates' example of applying philosophy to the study of human matters, including human nature, the nature of political communities, and human knowledge itself. The Socratic method as documented by Plato's dialogues is a dialectic method of hypothesis elimination: better hypotheses are found by steadily identifying and eliminating those that lead to contradictions. This was a reaction to the Sophist emphasis on rhetoric. The Socratic method searches for general commonly held truths that shape beliefs and scrutinizes them to determine their consistency with other beliefs. Socrates criticized the older type of study of physics as too purely speculative and lacking in self-criticism. Socrates was later, in the words of his\u00a0<em>Apology<\/em>, accused of corrupting the youth of Athens because he did \"not believe in the gods the state believes in, but in other new spiritual beings\". Socrates refuted these claims but was sentenced to death.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Aristotle\u00a0later created a systematic program of\u00a0<strong>teleological<\/strong>\u00a0philosophy: Motion and change is described as the actualization of potentials already in things, according to what types of things they are. In his physics, the Sun goes around the Earth, and many things have it as part of their nature that they are for humans. Each thing has a\u00a0formal cause, a\u00a0<strong>final cause<\/strong>, and a role in a cosmic order with an\u00a0unmoved mover. The Socratics also insisted that philosophy should be used to consider the practical question of the best way to live for a human being (a study Aristotle divided into\u00a0ethics\u00a0and\u00a0political philosophy). Aristotle maintained that man knows a thing scientifically \"when he possesses a conviction arrived at in a certain way, and when the first principles on which that conviction rests are known to him with certainty\".<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">The Greek astronomer\u00a0<strong>Aristarchus<\/strong> of Samos\u00a0(310\u2013230 BCE) was the first to propose a\u00a0heliocentric model\u00a0of the universe, with the\u00a0Sun\u00a0at the center and all the planets orbiting it.\u00a0Aristarchus's model was widely rejected because it was believed to violate the laws of physics.\u00a0The inventor and mathematician\u00a0<strong>Archimedes<\/strong> of Syracuse made major contributions to the beginnings of calculus and has sometimes been credited as its inventor, although his proto-calculus lacked several defining features. <strong>Pliny the Elder<\/strong>\u00a0was a Roman writer and polymath, who wrote the seminal encyclopedia\u00a0<em>Natural History<\/em>, dealing with history, geography, medicine, astronomy, earth science, botany, and zoology. Other scientists or proto-scientists in Antiquity were Theophrastus, Euclid, Herophilos, Hipparchus, Ptolemy, and Galen.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">Science in the Medieval Era<\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Because of the collapse of the Western Roman Empire due to the Migration Period, an intellectual decline took place in the western part of Europe in the 400s. In contrast, the Byzantine Empire resisted the attacks from invaders and preserved and improved upon learning. John Philoponus, a Byzantine scholar in the 500s, questioned Aristotle's teaching of physics, noting its flaws. John Philoponus' criticism of Aristotelian principles of physics served as an inspiration to medieval scholars as well as to Galileo Galilei who ten centuries later, during the Scientific Revolution, extensively cited Philoponus in his works while making the case for why Aristotelian physics was flawed.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">During\u00a0late antiquity\u00a0and the\u00a0early Middle Ages, the Aristotelian approach to inquiries on natural phenomena was used. Aristotle's\u00a0<strong>four causes<\/strong>\u00a0prescribed that the question \"why\" should be answered in four ways in order to explain things scientifically.\u00a0Some ancient knowledge was lost, or in some cases kept in obscurity, during the fall of the Western Roman Empire and periodic political struggles. However, the general fields of science (or \"natural philosophy\" as it was called) and much of the general knowledge from the ancient world remained preserved through the works of the early Latin encyclopedists like\u00a0Isidore of Seville.\u00a0However, Aristotle's original texts were eventually lost in Western Europe, and only one text by Plato was widely known, the\u00a0Timaeus, which was the only Platonic dialogue, and one of the few original works of classical natural philosophy, available to Latin readers in the early Middle Ages. Another original work that gained influence in this period was\u00a0Ptolemy's\u00a0Almagest, which contains a geocentric description of the solar system.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">During late antiquity, in the Byzantine empire, many Greek classical texts were preserved.\u00a0 Many Syriac translations were done by groups such as the Nestorians and Monophysites. They played a role when they translated Greek classical texts into Arabic under the Caliphate, during which many types of classical learning were preserved and, in some cases, improved upon. In addition, the neighboring Sassanid Empire established the medical Academy of Gondeshapur where Greek, Syriac, and Persian physicians established the most important medical center of the ancient world during the 6th and 7th centuries.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"aligncenter\" width=\"421\"]<img class=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/65\/2024\/01\/image77-2.jpeg\" alt=\"Drawing of the House of Knowledge Cairo\" width=\"421\" height=\"201\" \/> Dar al-\u2019Ilm drew scholars from across the Muslim world. It was established in 1005 with books donated by Caliph al-Hakim, whose own palace library was said to hold some 400,000 volumes.[\/caption]\r\n\r\nThe\u00a0<strong>House of Wisdom<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>was established in Abbasid-era Baghdad, Iraq, where the Islamic study of Aristotelianism flourished. Al-Kindi (801\u2013873) was the first of the Muslim Peripatetic philosophers and is known for his efforts to introduce Greek and Hellenistic philosophy to the Arab world. The Islamic Golden Age flourished from this time until the Mongol invasions of the 13th century. Ibn al-Haytham (Alhazen), as well as his predecessor Ibn Sahl, was familiar with Ptolemy's Optics and used experiments as a means to gain knowledge. Alhazen disproved Ptolemy's theory of vision but did not make any corresponding changes to Aristotle's metaphysics. Furthermore, doctors and alchemists such as the Persians <strong>Avicenna<\/strong> and <strong>Al-Razi<\/strong> also greatly developed the science of Medicine with the former writing the Canon of Medicine, a medical encyclopedia used until the 18th century, and the latter discovering multiple compounds like alcohol. Avicenna's canon is considered to be one of the most important publications in medicine and they both contributed significantly to the practice of experimental medicine, using clinical trials and experiments to back their claims.\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">In Classical antiquity, Greek and Roman taboos had meant that dissection was usually banned in ancient times, but in the Middle Ages, this changed: medical teachers and students at Bologna began to open human bodies, and Mondino de Luzzi (c. 1275\u20131326) produced the \ufb01rst known anatomy textbook based on human dissection.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">By the eleventh century, most of Europe had become Christian; stronger monarchies emerged; borders were restored; technological developments and agricultural innovations were made which increased the food supply and population. In addition, classical Greek texts started to be translated from Arabic and Greek into Latin, giving a higher level of scientific discussion in Western Europe.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">By 1088, the first university in Europe (the University of Bologna) had emerged from its clerical beginnings. Demand for Latin translations grew (for example, from the Toledo School of Translators); western Europeans began collecting texts written not only in Latin, but also in Latin translations from Greek, Arabic, and Hebrew. Manuscript copies of Alhazen's Book of Optics also propagated across Europe before 1240, as evidenced by its incorporation into Vitello's\u00a0<em>Perspectiva<\/em>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Avicenna's canon was translated into Latin. In particular, the texts of Aristotle, Ptolemy, and Euclid, preserved in the Houses of Wisdom and also in the Byzantine Empire, were sought by Catholic scholars. The influx of ancient texts caused the Renaissance of the 12th century and the flourishing of a synthesis of Catholicism and Aristotelianism known as Scholasticism in western Europe, which became a new geographic center of science. An experiment in this period would be understood as a careful process of observing, describing, and classifying. One prominent scientist in this era was\u00a0<strong>Roger Bacon<\/strong>. Scholasticism had a strong focus on revelation and dialectic reasoning and gradually fell out of favor over the next centuries, as alchemy's focus on experiments that include direct observation and meticulous documentation slowly increased in importance.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">Science in the Renaissance and Early Modern Era<\/h3>\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"215\"]<img src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/65\/2024\/01\/image78-2.jpeg\" alt=\"Drawing of Nicholas Copernicus holding a scientific instrument\" width=\"215\" height=\"314\" \/> Copernicus (1473-1543)[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\"><strong>Nicholas Copernicus\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">New developments in optics played a role in the inception of the\u00a0Renaissance, both by challenging long-held\u00a0metaphysical\u00a0ideas on perception, as well as by contributing to the improvement and development of technology such as the\u00a0camera obscura\u00a0and the\u00a0telescope. Before what we now know as the Renaissance started,\u00a0Roger Bacon,\u00a0Vitello, and\u00a0John Peckham\u00a0each built up a scholastic ontology upon a causal chain beginning with sensation, perception, and finally apperception of the individual and universal\u00a0forms\u00a0of Aristotle.\u00a0A model of vision later known as perspectivism was\u00a0exploited and studied\u00a0by the artists of the Renaissance. This theory uses only three of Aristotle's\u00a0four causes: formal, material, and final.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">In the sixteenth century,\u00a0<strong>Copernicus<\/strong> formulated a\u00a0heliocentric\u00a0model of the solar system, unlike the\u00a0geocentric model\u00a0of\u00a0Ptolemy's\u00a0Almagest. This was based on a theorem that the\u00a0orbital periods\u00a0of the planets are longer as their orbs are farther from the center of motion, which he found not to agree with Ptolemy's model.<\/p>\r\n<strong>Galileo Galilei\u00a0<\/strong>\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"207\"]<img src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/65\/2024\/01\/image79-2-scaled-1.jpeg\" alt=\"Galileo Galilei (1564-1642). Oil painting by an Italian painter, 18th (?) century.\" width=\"207\" height=\"254\" \/> Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\"><strong>Kepler<\/strong> and others challenged the notion that the only function of the eye is perception, and shifted the main focus in optics from the eye to the propagation of light.\u200a\u00a0Kepler modeled the eye as a water-filled glass sphere with an aperture in front of it to model the entrance pupil. He found that all the light from a single point of the scene was imaged at a single point at the back of the glass sphere. The optical chain ends on the retina at the back of the eye.\u00a0Kepler is best known, however, for improving Copernicus' heliocentric model through the discovery of\u00a0Kepler's laws of planetary motion. Kepler did not reject Aristotelian metaphysics and described his work as a search for the\u00a0Harmony of the Spheres.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\"><strong>Galileo<\/strong> made innovative use of experiments and mathematics. However, he became persecuted after Pope Urban VIII blessed Galileo to write about the Copernican system. Galileo had used arguments from the Pope and put them in the voice of the simpleton in the work \"Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems\", which greatly offended pope Urban VIII.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">In Northern Europe, the new technology of the\u00a0printing press\u00a0was widely used to publish many arguments, including some that disagreed widely with contemporary ideas of nature.\u00a0<strong>Ren\u00e9 Descartes<\/strong>\u00a0and\u00a0<strong>Francis Bacon<\/strong>\u00a0published philosophical arguments in favor of a new type of non-Aristotelian science. Descartes emphasized individual thought and argued that mathematics rather than geometry should be used in order to study nature. <strong>Bacon<\/strong> emphasized the importance of experiment over contemplation. Bacon further questioned the Aristotelian concepts of formal cause and final cause and promoted the idea that science should study the laws of \"simple\" natures, such as heat, rather than assuming that there is any specific nature, or \"formal cause\", of each complex type of thing. This new science began to see itself as describing \"laws of nature\". This updated approach to studies in nature was seen as mechanistic. Bacon also argued that science should aim for the first time at practical inventions for the improvement of all human life.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">Science in the Age of Enlightenment<\/h3>\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignright\" width=\"225\"]<img src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/65\/2024\/01\/image80-2.jpeg\" alt=\"Portrait of Isaac Newton (1642-1727). This is a copy of a painting by Sir Godfrey Kneller (1689).\" width=\"225\" height=\"309\" \/> Isaac Newton (1642-1727)[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">As a precursor to the\u00a0Age of Enlightenment,\u00a0<strong>Isaac Newton<\/strong>\u00a0and\u00a0<strong>Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz<\/strong>\u00a0succeeded in developing a new physics, now referred to as\u00a0classical mechanics, which could be confirmed by experiment and explained using mathematics (Newton (1687),\u00a0<em>Philosophi\u00e6 Naturalis Principia Mathematica<\/em>). Leibniz also incorporated terms from Aristotelian physics, but now being used in a new non-teleological way, for example, \"energy\" and \"potential\" (modern versions of Aristotelian\u00a0 \"<em>energeia\u00a0and\u00a0potentia<\/em>\"). This implied a shift in the view of objects: Where Aristotle had noted that objects have certain innate goals that can be actualized, objects were now regarded as devoid of innate goals. In the style of Francis Bacon, Leibniz assumed that different types of things all work according to the same general laws of nature, with no special formal or final causes for each type of thing.\u00a0It is during this period that the word \"science\" gradually became more commonly used to refer to a\u00a0type of pursuit\u00a0of a type of knowledge, especially knowledge of nature\u00a0\u2013 coming close in meaning to the old term \"natural philosophy.\"<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">During this time, the declared purpose and value of science became producing wealth and\u00a0inventions\u00a0that would improve human lives, in the\u00a0materialistic\u00a0sense of having more food, clothing, and other things. In\u00a0Bacon's words, \"the real and legitimate goal of sciences is the endowment of human life with new inventions and riches\", and he discouraged scientists from pursuing intangible philosophical or spiritual ideas, which he believed contributed little to human happiness beyond \"the fume of subtle, sublime, or pleasing speculation\".<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Science during the Enlightenment was dominated by scientific societies and academies, which had largely replaced universities as centers of scientific research and development. Societies and academies were also the backbones of the maturation of the scientific profession. Another important development was the popularization of science among an increasingly literate population. Philosophes introduced the public to many scientific theories, most notably through the <em>Encyclop\u00e9die<\/em>\u00a0and the popularization of\u00a0Newtonianism\u00a0by\u00a0Voltaire\u00a0as well as by \u00c9milie du Ch\u00e2telet, the French translator of Newton's\u00a0Principia.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Some historians have marked the 18th century as a drab period in the history of science; however, the century saw significant advancements in the practice of medicine, mathematics, and physics; the development of biological taxonomy; a new understanding of magnetism and electricity; and the maturation of chemistry as a discipline, which established the foundations of modern chemistry.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Enlightenment\u00a0philosophers chose a short history of scientific predecessors\u00a0\u2013\u00a0Galileo,\u00a0Boyle, and\u00a0Newton\u00a0principally\u00a0\u2013 as the guides and guarantors of their applications of the singular concept of\u00a0nature\u00a0and\u00a0natural law\u00a0to every physical and social field of the day. In this respect, the lessons of history and the social structures built upon it could be discarded.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Ideas on human nature, society, and economics also evolved during the Enlightenment. Hume and other Scottish Enlightenment thinkers developed a \"science of man\", which was expressed historically in works by authors including James Burnett, Adam Ferguson, John Millar, and William Robertson, all of whom merged a scientific study of how humans behaved in ancient and primitive cultures with a strong awareness of the determining forces of modernity. Modern sociology largely originated from this movement. In 1776, Adam Smith published The Wealth of Nations, which is often considered the first work on modern economics.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">Science in the 19th century<\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">The nineteenth century is a particularly important period in the history of science since during this era many distinguishing characteristics of contemporary modern science began to take shape such as the transformation of the life and physical sciences, frequent use of precision instruments, emergence of terms like \"biologist\", \"physicist\", \"scientist\"; slowly moving away from antiquated labels like \"natural philosophy\" and \"natural history\", increased professionalization of those studying nature lead to a reduction in amateur naturalists, scientists gained cultural authority over many dimensions of society, economic expansion, and industrialization of numerous countries, thriving of popular science writings and the emergence of science journals.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"202\"]<img class=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/65\/2024\/01\/image81-2-scaled-1.jpeg\" alt=\"A photograph of Charles Darwin by Julia Margaret Cameron, from 1868\" width=\"202\" height=\"247\" \/> Charles Darwin (1809-1882)[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Early in the 19th century,\u00a0John Dalton\u00a0suggested the modern\u00a0atomic theory, based on\u00a0Democritus's original idea of indivisible particles called\u00a0atoms.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Both\u00a0John Herschel\u00a0and\u00a0William Whewell\u00a0systematized methodology: the latter coined the term\u00a0scientist.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">During the mid-19th century,\u00a0<strong>Charles Darwin<\/strong>\u00a0and\u00a0Alfred Russel Wallace\u00a0independently proposed the theory of evolution by\u00a0natural selection\u00a0in 1858, which explained how different plants and animals originated and evolved. Their theory was set out in detail in Darwin's book\u00a0On the Origin of Species, which was published in 1859.\u00a0Separately,\u00a0Gregor Mendel\u00a0presented his paper, \"<em>Versuche \u00fcber Pflanzenhybriden<\/em>\" (\"Experiments on Plant Hybridization\"), in 1865,\u00a0which outlined the principles of biological inheritance, serving as the basis for modern genetics.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">The laws of conservation of energy, conservation of momentum, and conservation of mass suggested a highly stable universe where there could be little loss of resources. With the advent of the steam engine and the industrial revolution, there was, however, an increased understanding that all forms of energy as defined in physics were not equally useful: they did not have the same energy quality. This realization led to the development of the laws of thermodynamics, in which the free energy of the universe is seen as constantly declining: the entropy of a closed universe increases over time.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">The\u00a0electromagnetic theory\u00a0was also established in the 19th century by the works of\u00a0Hans Christian \u00d8rsted,\u00a0Andr\u00e9-Marie Amp\u00e8re,\u00a0Michael Faraday,\u00a0James Clerk Maxwell,\u00a0Oliver Heaviside, and\u00a0Heinrich Hertz. The new theory raised questions that could not easily be answered using Newton's framework. The phenomena that would allow the deconstruction of the\u00a0atom\u00a0were discovered in the last decade of the 19th century: the discovery of\u00a0X-rays\u00a0inspired the discovery of\u00a0radioactivity. In the next year came the discovery of the first subatomic particle, the\u00a0electron.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">During the late 19th century, psychology emerged as a separate discipline from philosophy when\u00a0Wilhelm Wundt\u00a0founded the first laboratory for psychological research in 1879.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">Science in the 20th century<\/h3>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\"><strong>Albert Einstein<\/strong>'s theory of relativity and the development of quantum mechanics led to the replacement of classical mechanics with a new physics that contains two parts that describe different types of events in nature.<\/p>\r\n\r\n\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"199\"]<img src=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/6\/6f\/Einstein-formal_portrait-35.jpg\" alt=\"Portrait of Einstein taken in 1935 at Princeton\" width=\"199\" height=\"257\" \/> Albert Einstein (1879-1955)[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">In the first half of the century, the development of\u00a0antibiotics\u00a0and\u00a0artificial fertilizers\u00a0made global human\u00a0population growth\u00a0possible. At the same time, the structure of the atom and its nucleus was discovered, leading to the release of \"atomic energy\" (nuclear power). In addition, the extensive use of technological innovation stimulated by the wars of this century led to revolutions in transportation (automobiles\u00a0and\u00a0aircraft), the development of\u00a0ICBMs, a\u00a0space race, and a\u00a0nuclear arms race.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Evolution became a unified theory in the early 20th century when the modern synthesis reconciled Darwinian evolution with classical genetics. The molecular structure of DNA was discovered by James Watson and Francis Crick in 1953.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">The discovery of the\u00a0cosmic microwave background radiation\u00a0in 1964 led to a rejection of the\u00a0Steady State theory\u00a0of the universe in favor of the\u00a0Big Bang\u00a0theory of\u00a0<strong>Georges Lema\u00eetre<\/strong>.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">The development of\u00a0spaceflight\u00a0in the second half of the century allowed the first astronomical measurements done on or near other objects in space, including six\u00a0manned landings on the Moon.\u00a0Space telescopes\u00a0lead to numerous discoveries in astronomy and cosmology.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Widespread use of integrated circuits in the last quarter of the 20th century combined with communications satellites led to a revolution in information technology and the rise of the global internet and mobile computing, including smartphones. The need for mass systematization of long, intertwined causal chains and large amounts of data led to the rise of the fields of systems theory and computer-assisted scientific modeling, which are partly based on the Aristotelian paradigm.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Harmful environmental issues such as ozone depletion, acidification, eutrophication, and climate change came to the public's attention in the same period and caused the onset of environmental science and environmental technology.<\/p>\r\n\r\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">21st century<\/h3>\r\n[caption id=\"\" align=\"alignleft\" width=\"320\"]<img src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/65\/2024\/01\/image83-2.png\" alt=\" Diagram of components of the genome as estimated in 2014. Reflects 26% Introns, 12% Misc. unique sequences, 8% Misc. heterochromatin, 5% Segmental duplications, 3% Simple sequence repeats, 3% DNA transposons, 8% LTR retro-transposons, 13%% SINEs, 20% LINEs, and 2% Protein-coding genes \" width=\"320\" height=\"268\" \/> Diagram of components of the genome as estimated in 2014.[\/caption]\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">The\u00a0Human Genome Project\u00a0was completed in 2003, determining the sequence of nucleotide base pairs that make up human DNA, and identifying and mapping all of the genes of the human genome.\u00a0Induced pluripotent stem cells\u00a0were developed in 2006, a technology allowing adult cells to be transformed into stem cells capable of giving rise to any cell type found in the body, potentially of huge importance to the field of\u00a0regenerative medicine.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">With the discovery of the\u00a0Higgs boson\u00a0in 2012, the last particle predicted by the\u00a0Standard Model\u00a0of particle physics was found. In 2015,\u00a0gravitational waves, predicted by\u00a0general relativity\u00a0a century before, were\u00a0first observed.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;\">As this survey shows, although the empirical approach today dominates science, such was not always the case. Thinkers like Copernicus, Descartes, Leibniz, Galileo (and more recently Einstein) devised their scientific theories only in part on observation, but to a much larger extent upon their mathematical and logical (rationalist) presuppositions that the universe had to follow fundamental rules of reason. They used observations as proof of their rational explanations of the cosmos.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;\">However, beginning with Francis Bacon in the early 17<sup>th<\/sup> century, the tools and assumptions of empiricism came to dominate the scientific enterprise. Empiricists like Bacon and Isaac Newton found observation and experimentation to be the starting point for science. Theories came later.<\/p>\r\n&nbsp;\r\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Works Cited<\/strong><\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">\u201cAlbert Einstein - Colorized.\u201d <i>Wikimedia Commons<\/i>, 19 Feb. 2014, https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Albert_Einstein_-_Colorized.jpg.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Bramley, Barrington. \u201cPortrait of Isaac Newton (1642-1727). This Is a Copy of a Painting by Sir Godfrey Kneller (1689).\u201d <i>Wikimedia Commons<\/i>, 1992, https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:GodfreyKneller-IsaacNewton-1689.jpg. Accessed 13 May 2022.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">\u201cCairo's House of Knowledge.\u201d <i>AramcoWorld<\/i>, https:\/\/www.aramcoworld.com\/Articles\/January-2019\/Cairo-s-House-of-Knowledge. Accessed 13 May 2022.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Cameron, Julia Margaret. \u201cA Photograph of Charles Darwin by Julia Margaret Cameron, from 1868.\u201d <i>Wikimedia Commons<\/i>, 1868, https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Charles_Darwin_photograph_by_Julia_Margaret_Cameron,_1868.jpg. Accessed 13 May 2022.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">\u201cCarving on a Mesoptamian Sarcaphogus.\u201d <i>PxHere<\/i>, https:\/\/pxhere.com\/en\/photo\/1367444?utm_content=shareClip&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_source=pxhere. Accessed 13 May 2022.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">\u201cDiagram of Components of the Genome as Estimated in 2014.\u201d <i>Wikimedia Commons<\/i>, 10 Mar. 2014, https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Components_of_the_human_genome.png. Accessed 13 May 2022.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">\u201cGalileo Galilei (1564-1642). Oil Painting by an Italian Painter, 18th (?) Century.\u201d <i>Wikimedia Commons<\/i>, https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Galileo_Galilei_(1564-1642)._Oil_painting_by_an_Italian_pain_Wellcome_V0023487.jpg. Accessed 13 May 2022.<\/p>\r\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Westermayr, Konrad. \u201cNICOLAUS COPERNICUS.\u201d <i>Wikimedia Commons<\/i>, 1804, https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Nicolaus_Copernicus_AGE_V13_1804.jpg. Accessed 13 May 2022.<\/p>","rendered":"<div class=\"textbox shaded\">\n<p><strong>LEARNING OBJECTIVES<\/strong><\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>By the end of this section you will discover:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>A brief history of the development of science in Western culture.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<\/div>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">Science in Ancient Mesopotamia<\/h3>\n<figure style=\"width: 275px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/65\/2022\/03\/image75-2-1.jpeg\" alt=\"Carving on a Mesopotamian Sarcophagus\" width=\"275\" height=\"183\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">A carving on a Mesopotamian Sarcophagus<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">The earliest roots of science can be traced to\u00a0Ancient Egypt\u00a0and\u00a0Mesopotamia\u00a0in around 3000 to 1200 BCE.\u00a0Although the words and concepts of &#8220;science&#8221; and &#8220;nature&#8221; were not part of the conceptual landscape at the time, the ancient Egyptians and Mesopotamians made contributions that would later find a place in Greek and medieval science: <strong>mathematics<\/strong>, <strong>astronomy<\/strong>, and <strong>medicine<\/strong>. Starting in around 3000 BCE, the ancient Egyptians developed a numbering system that was decimal in character and orientated their knowledge of geometry to solve practical problems such as those of surveyors and builders. They even developed an official calendar that contained twelve months, thirty days each, and five days at the end of the year. Based on the medical papyri written between 2500-1200 BCE, the ancient Egyptians believed that disease was mainly caused by the invasion of bodies by evil forces or spirits. Thus, in addition to drug treatments, healing therapies would involve prayer, incantation, and ritual.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">The ancient Mesopotamians used knowledge about the properties of various natural chemicals for manufacturing pottery, faience, glass, soap, metals, lime plaster, and waterproofing; they also studied animal physiology, anatomy, and behavior for divinatory purposes and made extensive records of the movements of astronomical objects for their study of astrology. The Mesopotamians had an intense interest in medicine and the earliest medical prescriptions appeared in Sumerian writing during the Third Dynasty of Ur (c. 2112 BCE \u2013 c. 2004 BCE). Nonetheless, the Mesopotamians seem to have had little interest in gathering information about the natural world for the mere sake of gathering information and mainly only studied scientific subjects which had obvious practical applications or immediate relevance to their religious system.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">Science in Classical antiquity<\/h3>\n<figure style=\"width: 166px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/65\/2024\/01\/image76-2-scaled-1.jpeg\" alt=\"A bust of Hippocrates\" width=\"166\" height=\"256\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Hippocrates (460-375 BCE)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">In\u00a0classical antiquity, there is no real ancient analog of a modern\u00a0scientist. Instead, well-educated, usually upper-class, and almost universally male individuals performed various investigations into nature whenever they could afford the time. \u00a0Before the invention or discovery of the\u00a0concept\u00a0of &#8220;nature&#8221; (ancient Greek\u00a0<em>physis<\/em>) by the\u00a0Pre-Socratic philosophers, the same words tend to be used to describe the\u00a0natural\u00a0&#8220;way&#8221; in which a plant grows, \u00a0and the &#8220;way&#8221; in which, for example, one tribe worships a particular god. For this reason, it is claimed these men were the first philosophers in the strict sense, and also the first people to clearly distinguish &#8220;nature&#8221; and &#8220;convention.&#8221; \u00a0<strong>Natural philosophy<\/strong>, the precursor of natural science, was thereby distinguished as the knowledge of nature and things that are true for every community, and the name of the specialized pursuit of such knowledge was philosophy \u2013 the realm of the first philosopher-physicists. They were mainly speculators or theorists, particularly interested in astronomy. In contrast, trying to use knowledge of nature to imitate nature (artifice or technology, Greek\u00a0<em>techn\u0113<\/em>) was seen by classical scientists as a more appropriate interest for\u00a0artisans\u00a0of lower\u00a0social class&#8230;.. The early\u00a0Greek philosophers\u00a0of the\u00a0Milesian school, which was founded by\u00a0Thales of Miletus\u00a0and later continued by his successors\u00a0Anaximander\u00a0and\u00a0Anaximenes, were the first to attempt to explain\u00a0natural phenomena\u00a0without relying on the\u00a0supernatural. \u00a0The\u00a0Pythagoreans\u00a0developed a complex number philosophy\u200aand contributed significantly to the development of mathematical science.\u200a\u00a0The\u00a0theory of atoms\u00a0was developed by the Greek philosopher\u00a0Leucippus\u00a0and his student\u00a0Democritus. The Greek doctor\u00a0Hippocrates\u00a0established the tradition of systematic medical science and is known as &#8220;The Father of Medicine&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">A turning point in the history of early philosophical science was Socrates&#8217; example of applying philosophy to the study of human matters, including human nature, the nature of political communities, and human knowledge itself. The Socratic method as documented by Plato&#8217;s dialogues is a dialectic method of hypothesis elimination: better hypotheses are found by steadily identifying and eliminating those that lead to contradictions. This was a reaction to the Sophist emphasis on rhetoric. The Socratic method searches for general commonly held truths that shape beliefs and scrutinizes them to determine their consistency with other beliefs. Socrates criticized the older type of study of physics as too purely speculative and lacking in self-criticism. Socrates was later, in the words of his\u00a0<em>Apology<\/em>, accused of corrupting the youth of Athens because he did &#8220;not believe in the gods the state believes in, but in other new spiritual beings&#8221;. Socrates refuted these claims but was sentenced to death.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Aristotle\u00a0later created a systematic program of\u00a0<strong>teleological<\/strong>\u00a0philosophy: Motion and change is described as the actualization of potentials already in things, according to what types of things they are. In his physics, the Sun goes around the Earth, and many things have it as part of their nature that they are for humans. Each thing has a\u00a0formal cause, a\u00a0<strong>final cause<\/strong>, and a role in a cosmic order with an\u00a0unmoved mover. The Socratics also insisted that philosophy should be used to consider the practical question of the best way to live for a human being (a study Aristotle divided into\u00a0ethics\u00a0and\u00a0political philosophy). Aristotle maintained that man knows a thing scientifically &#8220;when he possesses a conviction arrived at in a certain way, and when the first principles on which that conviction rests are known to him with certainty&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">The Greek astronomer\u00a0<strong>Aristarchus<\/strong> of Samos\u00a0(310\u2013230 BCE) was the first to propose a\u00a0heliocentric model\u00a0of the universe, with the\u00a0Sun\u00a0at the center and all the planets orbiting it.\u00a0Aristarchus&#8217;s model was widely rejected because it was believed to violate the laws of physics.\u00a0The inventor and mathematician\u00a0<strong>Archimedes<\/strong> of Syracuse made major contributions to the beginnings of calculus and has sometimes been credited as its inventor, although his proto-calculus lacked several defining features. <strong>Pliny the Elder<\/strong>\u00a0was a Roman writer and polymath, who wrote the seminal encyclopedia\u00a0<em>Natural History<\/em>, dealing with history, geography, medicine, astronomy, earth science, botany, and zoology. Other scientists or proto-scientists in Antiquity were Theophrastus, Euclid, Herophilos, Hipparchus, Ptolemy, and Galen.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">Science in the Medieval Era<\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Because of the collapse of the Western Roman Empire due to the Migration Period, an intellectual decline took place in the western part of Europe in the 400s. In contrast, the Byzantine Empire resisted the attacks from invaders and preserved and improved upon learning. John Philoponus, a Byzantine scholar in the 500s, questioned Aristotle&#8217;s teaching of physics, noting its flaws. John Philoponus&#8217; criticism of Aristotelian principles of physics served as an inspiration to medieval scholars as well as to Galileo Galilei who ten centuries later, during the Scientific Revolution, extensively cited Philoponus in his works while making the case for why Aristotelian physics was flawed.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">During\u00a0late antiquity\u00a0and the\u00a0early Middle Ages, the Aristotelian approach to inquiries on natural phenomena was used. Aristotle&#8217;s\u00a0<strong>four causes<\/strong>\u00a0prescribed that the question &#8220;why&#8221; should be answered in four ways in order to explain things scientifically.\u00a0Some ancient knowledge was lost, or in some cases kept in obscurity, during the fall of the Western Roman Empire and periodic political struggles. However, the general fields of science (or &#8220;natural philosophy&#8221; as it was called) and much of the general knowledge from the ancient world remained preserved through the works of the early Latin encyclopedists like\u00a0Isidore of Seville.\u00a0However, Aristotle&#8217;s original texts were eventually lost in Western Europe, and only one text by Plato was widely known, the\u00a0Timaeus, which was the only Platonic dialogue, and one of the few original works of classical natural philosophy, available to Latin readers in the early Middle Ages. Another original work that gained influence in this period was\u00a0Ptolemy&#8217;s\u00a0Almagest, which contains a geocentric description of the solar system.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">During late antiquity, in the Byzantine empire, many Greek classical texts were preserved.\u00a0 Many Syriac translations were done by groups such as the Nestorians and Monophysites. They played a role when they translated Greek classical texts into Arabic under the Caliphate, during which many types of classical learning were preserved and, in some cases, improved upon. In addition, the neighboring Sassanid Empire established the medical Academy of Gondeshapur where Greek, Syriac, and Persian physicians established the most important medical center of the ancient world during the 6th and 7th centuries.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 421px\" class=\"wp-caption aligncenter\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/65\/2024\/01\/image77-2.jpeg\" alt=\"Drawing of the House of Knowledge Cairo\" width=\"421\" height=\"201\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Dar al-\u2019Ilm drew scholars from across the Muslim world. It was established in 1005 with books donated by Caliph al-Hakim, whose own palace library was said to hold some 400,000 volumes.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The\u00a0<strong>House of Wisdom<\/strong><strong>\u00a0<\/strong>was established in Abbasid-era Baghdad, Iraq, where the Islamic study of Aristotelianism flourished. Al-Kindi (801\u2013873) was the first of the Muslim Peripatetic philosophers and is known for his efforts to introduce Greek and Hellenistic philosophy to the Arab world. The Islamic Golden Age flourished from this time until the Mongol invasions of the 13th century. Ibn al-Haytham (Alhazen), as well as his predecessor Ibn Sahl, was familiar with Ptolemy&#8217;s Optics and used experiments as a means to gain knowledge. Alhazen disproved Ptolemy&#8217;s theory of vision but did not make any corresponding changes to Aristotle&#8217;s metaphysics. Furthermore, doctors and alchemists such as the Persians <strong>Avicenna<\/strong> and <strong>Al-Razi<\/strong> also greatly developed the science of Medicine with the former writing the Canon of Medicine, a medical encyclopedia used until the 18th century, and the latter discovering multiple compounds like alcohol. Avicenna&#8217;s canon is considered to be one of the most important publications in medicine and they both contributed significantly to the practice of experimental medicine, using clinical trials and experiments to back their claims.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">In Classical antiquity, Greek and Roman taboos had meant that dissection was usually banned in ancient times, but in the Middle Ages, this changed: medical teachers and students at Bologna began to open human bodies, and Mondino de Luzzi (c. 1275\u20131326) produced the \ufb01rst known anatomy textbook based on human dissection.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">By the eleventh century, most of Europe had become Christian; stronger monarchies emerged; borders were restored; technological developments and agricultural innovations were made which increased the food supply and population. In addition, classical Greek texts started to be translated from Arabic and Greek into Latin, giving a higher level of scientific discussion in Western Europe.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">By 1088, the first university in Europe (the University of Bologna) had emerged from its clerical beginnings. Demand for Latin translations grew (for example, from the Toledo School of Translators); western Europeans began collecting texts written not only in Latin, but also in Latin translations from Greek, Arabic, and Hebrew. Manuscript copies of Alhazen&#8217;s Book of Optics also propagated across Europe before 1240, as evidenced by its incorporation into Vitello&#8217;s\u00a0<em>Perspectiva<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Avicenna&#8217;s canon was translated into Latin. In particular, the texts of Aristotle, Ptolemy, and Euclid, preserved in the Houses of Wisdom and also in the Byzantine Empire, were sought by Catholic scholars. The influx of ancient texts caused the Renaissance of the 12th century and the flourishing of a synthesis of Catholicism and Aristotelianism known as Scholasticism in western Europe, which became a new geographic center of science. An experiment in this period would be understood as a careful process of observing, describing, and classifying. One prominent scientist in this era was\u00a0<strong>Roger Bacon<\/strong>. Scholasticism had a strong focus on revelation and dialectic reasoning and gradually fell out of favor over the next centuries, as alchemy&#8217;s focus on experiments that include direct observation and meticulous documentation slowly increased in importance.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">Science in the Renaissance and Early Modern Era<\/h3>\n<figure style=\"width: 215px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/65\/2024\/01\/image78-2.jpeg\" alt=\"Drawing of Nicholas Copernicus holding a scientific instrument\" width=\"215\" height=\"314\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Copernicus (1473-1543)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\"><strong>Nicholas Copernicus\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">New developments in optics played a role in the inception of the\u00a0Renaissance, both by challenging long-held\u00a0metaphysical\u00a0ideas on perception, as well as by contributing to the improvement and development of technology such as the\u00a0camera obscura\u00a0and the\u00a0telescope. Before what we now know as the Renaissance started,\u00a0Roger Bacon,\u00a0Vitello, and\u00a0John Peckham\u00a0each built up a scholastic ontology upon a causal chain beginning with sensation, perception, and finally apperception of the individual and universal\u00a0forms\u00a0of Aristotle.\u00a0A model of vision later known as perspectivism was\u00a0exploited and studied\u00a0by the artists of the Renaissance. This theory uses only three of Aristotle&#8217;s\u00a0four causes: formal, material, and final.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">In the sixteenth century,\u00a0<strong>Copernicus<\/strong> formulated a\u00a0heliocentric\u00a0model of the solar system, unlike the\u00a0geocentric model\u00a0of\u00a0Ptolemy&#8217;s\u00a0Almagest. This was based on a theorem that the\u00a0orbital periods\u00a0of the planets are longer as their orbs are farther from the center of motion, which he found not to agree with Ptolemy&#8217;s model.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Galileo Galilei\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 207px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/65\/2024\/01\/image79-2-scaled-1.jpeg\" alt=\"Galileo Galilei (1564-1642). Oil painting by an Italian painter, 18th (?) century.\" width=\"207\" height=\"254\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Galileo Galilei (1564-1642)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\"><strong>Kepler<\/strong> and others challenged the notion that the only function of the eye is perception, and shifted the main focus in optics from the eye to the propagation of light.\u200a\u00a0Kepler modeled the eye as a water-filled glass sphere with an aperture in front of it to model the entrance pupil. He found that all the light from a single point of the scene was imaged at a single point at the back of the glass sphere. The optical chain ends on the retina at the back of the eye.\u00a0Kepler is best known, however, for improving Copernicus&#8217; heliocentric model through the discovery of\u00a0Kepler&#8217;s laws of planetary motion. Kepler did not reject Aristotelian metaphysics and described his work as a search for the\u00a0Harmony of the Spheres.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\"><strong>Galileo<\/strong> made innovative use of experiments and mathematics. However, he became persecuted after Pope Urban VIII blessed Galileo to write about the Copernican system. Galileo had used arguments from the Pope and put them in the voice of the simpleton in the work &#8220;Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems&#8221;, which greatly offended pope Urban VIII.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">In Northern Europe, the new technology of the\u00a0printing press\u00a0was widely used to publish many arguments, including some that disagreed widely with contemporary ideas of nature.\u00a0<strong>Ren\u00e9 Descartes<\/strong>\u00a0and\u00a0<strong>Francis Bacon<\/strong>\u00a0published philosophical arguments in favor of a new type of non-Aristotelian science. Descartes emphasized individual thought and argued that mathematics rather than geometry should be used in order to study nature. <strong>Bacon<\/strong> emphasized the importance of experiment over contemplation. Bacon further questioned the Aristotelian concepts of formal cause and final cause and promoted the idea that science should study the laws of &#8220;simple&#8221; natures, such as heat, rather than assuming that there is any specific nature, or &#8220;formal cause&#8221;, of each complex type of thing. This new science began to see itself as describing &#8220;laws of nature&#8221;. This updated approach to studies in nature was seen as mechanistic. Bacon also argued that science should aim for the first time at practical inventions for the improvement of all human life.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">Science in the Age of Enlightenment<\/h3>\n<figure style=\"width: 225px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/65\/2024\/01\/image80-2.jpeg\" alt=\"Portrait of Isaac Newton (1642-1727). This is a copy of a painting by Sir Godfrey Kneller (1689).\" width=\"225\" height=\"309\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Isaac Newton (1642-1727)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">As a precursor to the\u00a0Age of Enlightenment,\u00a0<strong>Isaac Newton<\/strong>\u00a0and\u00a0<strong>Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz<\/strong>\u00a0succeeded in developing a new physics, now referred to as\u00a0classical mechanics, which could be confirmed by experiment and explained using mathematics (Newton (1687),\u00a0<em>Philosophi\u00e6 Naturalis Principia Mathematica<\/em>). Leibniz also incorporated terms from Aristotelian physics, but now being used in a new non-teleological way, for example, &#8220;energy&#8221; and &#8220;potential&#8221; (modern versions of Aristotelian\u00a0 &#8220;<em>energeia\u00a0and\u00a0potentia<\/em>&#8220;). This implied a shift in the view of objects: Where Aristotle had noted that objects have certain innate goals that can be actualized, objects were now regarded as devoid of innate goals. In the style of Francis Bacon, Leibniz assumed that different types of things all work according to the same general laws of nature, with no special formal or final causes for each type of thing.\u00a0It is during this period that the word &#8220;science&#8221; gradually became more commonly used to refer to a\u00a0type of pursuit\u00a0of a type of knowledge, especially knowledge of nature\u00a0\u2013 coming close in meaning to the old term &#8220;natural philosophy.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">During this time, the declared purpose and value of science became producing wealth and\u00a0inventions\u00a0that would improve human lives, in the\u00a0materialistic\u00a0sense of having more food, clothing, and other things. In\u00a0Bacon&#8217;s words, &#8220;the real and legitimate goal of sciences is the endowment of human life with new inventions and riches&#8221;, and he discouraged scientists from pursuing intangible philosophical or spiritual ideas, which he believed contributed little to human happiness beyond &#8220;the fume of subtle, sublime, or pleasing speculation&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Science during the Enlightenment was dominated by scientific societies and academies, which had largely replaced universities as centers of scientific research and development. Societies and academies were also the backbones of the maturation of the scientific profession. Another important development was the popularization of science among an increasingly literate population. Philosophes introduced the public to many scientific theories, most notably through the <em>Encyclop\u00e9die<\/em>\u00a0and the popularization of\u00a0Newtonianism\u00a0by\u00a0Voltaire\u00a0as well as by \u00c9milie du Ch\u00e2telet, the French translator of Newton&#8217;s\u00a0Principia.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Some historians have marked the 18th century as a drab period in the history of science; however, the century saw significant advancements in the practice of medicine, mathematics, and physics; the development of biological taxonomy; a new understanding of magnetism and electricity; and the maturation of chemistry as a discipline, which established the foundations of modern chemistry.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Enlightenment\u00a0philosophers chose a short history of scientific predecessors\u00a0\u2013\u00a0Galileo,\u00a0Boyle, and\u00a0Newton\u00a0principally\u00a0\u2013 as the guides and guarantors of their applications of the singular concept of\u00a0nature\u00a0and\u00a0natural law\u00a0to every physical and social field of the day. In this respect, the lessons of history and the social structures built upon it could be discarded.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Ideas on human nature, society, and economics also evolved during the Enlightenment. Hume and other Scottish Enlightenment thinkers developed a &#8220;science of man&#8221;, which was expressed historically in works by authors including James Burnett, Adam Ferguson, John Millar, and William Robertson, all of whom merged a scientific study of how humans behaved in ancient and primitive cultures with a strong awareness of the determining forces of modernity. Modern sociology largely originated from this movement. In 1776, Adam Smith published The Wealth of Nations, which is often considered the first work on modern economics.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">Science in the 19th century<\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">The nineteenth century is a particularly important period in the history of science since during this era many distinguishing characteristics of contemporary modern science began to take shape such as the transformation of the life and physical sciences, frequent use of precision instruments, emergence of terms like &#8220;biologist&#8221;, &#8220;physicist&#8221;, &#8220;scientist&#8221;; slowly moving away from antiquated labels like &#8220;natural philosophy&#8221; and &#8220;natural history&#8221;, increased professionalization of those studying nature lead to a reduction in amateur naturalists, scientists gained cultural authority over many dimensions of society, economic expansion, and industrialization of numerous countries, thriving of popular science writings and the emergence of science journals.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 202px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"\" src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/65\/2024\/01\/image81-2-scaled-1.jpeg\" alt=\"A photograph of Charles Darwin by Julia Margaret Cameron, from 1868\" width=\"202\" height=\"247\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Charles Darwin (1809-1882)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Early in the 19th century,\u00a0John Dalton\u00a0suggested the modern\u00a0atomic theory, based on\u00a0Democritus&#8217;s original idea of indivisible particles called\u00a0atoms.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Both\u00a0John Herschel\u00a0and\u00a0William Whewell\u00a0systematized methodology: the latter coined the term\u00a0scientist.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">During the mid-19th century,\u00a0<strong>Charles Darwin<\/strong>\u00a0and\u00a0Alfred Russel Wallace\u00a0independently proposed the theory of evolution by\u00a0natural selection\u00a0in 1858, which explained how different plants and animals originated and evolved. Their theory was set out in detail in Darwin&#8217;s book\u00a0On the Origin of Species, which was published in 1859.\u00a0Separately,\u00a0Gregor Mendel\u00a0presented his paper, &#8220;<em>Versuche \u00fcber Pflanzenhybriden<\/em>&#8221; (&#8220;Experiments on Plant Hybridization&#8221;), in 1865,\u00a0which outlined the principles of biological inheritance, serving as the basis for modern genetics.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">The laws of conservation of energy, conservation of momentum, and conservation of mass suggested a highly stable universe where there could be little loss of resources. With the advent of the steam engine and the industrial revolution, there was, however, an increased understanding that all forms of energy as defined in physics were not equally useful: they did not have the same energy quality. This realization led to the development of the laws of thermodynamics, in which the free energy of the universe is seen as constantly declining: the entropy of a closed universe increases over time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">The\u00a0electromagnetic theory\u00a0was also established in the 19th century by the works of\u00a0Hans Christian \u00d8rsted,\u00a0Andr\u00e9-Marie Amp\u00e8re,\u00a0Michael Faraday,\u00a0James Clerk Maxwell,\u00a0Oliver Heaviside, and\u00a0Heinrich Hertz. The new theory raised questions that could not easily be answered using Newton&#8217;s framework. The phenomena that would allow the deconstruction of the\u00a0atom\u00a0were discovered in the last decade of the 19th century: the discovery of\u00a0X-rays\u00a0inspired the discovery of\u00a0radioactivity. In the next year came the discovery of the first subatomic particle, the\u00a0electron.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">During the late 19th century, psychology emerged as a separate discipline from philosophy when\u00a0Wilhelm Wundt\u00a0founded the first laboratory for psychological research in 1879.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">Science in the 20th century<\/h3>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\"><strong>Albert Einstein<\/strong>&#8216;s theory of relativity and the development of quantum mechanics led to the replacement of classical mechanics with a new physics that contains two parts that describe different types of events in nature.<\/p>\n<figure style=\"width: 199px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/upload.wikimedia.org\/wikipedia\/commons\/6\/6f\/Einstein-formal_portrait-35.jpg\" alt=\"Portrait of Einstein taken in 1935 at Princeton\" width=\"199\" height=\"257\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Albert Einstein (1879-1955)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">In the first half of the century, the development of\u00a0antibiotics\u00a0and\u00a0artificial fertilizers\u00a0made global human\u00a0population growth\u00a0possible. At the same time, the structure of the atom and its nucleus was discovered, leading to the release of &#8220;atomic energy&#8221; (nuclear power). In addition, the extensive use of technological innovation stimulated by the wars of this century led to revolutions in transportation (automobiles\u00a0and\u00a0aircraft), the development of\u00a0ICBMs, a\u00a0space race, and a\u00a0nuclear arms race.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Evolution became a unified theory in the early 20th century when the modern synthesis reconciled Darwinian evolution with classical genetics. The molecular structure of DNA was discovered by James Watson and Francis Crick in 1953.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">The discovery of the\u00a0cosmic microwave background radiation\u00a0in 1964 led to a rejection of the\u00a0Steady State theory\u00a0of the universe in favor of the\u00a0Big Bang\u00a0theory of\u00a0<strong>Georges Lema\u00eetre<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">The development of\u00a0spaceflight\u00a0in the second half of the century allowed the first astronomical measurements done on or near other objects in space, including six\u00a0manned landings on the Moon.\u00a0Space telescopes\u00a0lead to numerous discoveries in astronomy and cosmology.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Widespread use of integrated circuits in the last quarter of the 20th century combined with communications satellites led to a revolution in information technology and the rise of the global internet and mobile computing, including smartphones. The need for mass systematization of long, intertwined causal chains and large amounts of data led to the rise of the fields of systems theory and computer-assisted scientific modeling, which are partly based on the Aristotelian paradigm.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">Harmful environmental issues such as ozone depletion, acidification, eutrophication, and climate change came to the public&#8217;s attention in the same period and caused the onset of environmental science and environmental technology.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"import-Normal\">21st century<\/h3>\n<figure style=\"width: 320px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/65\/2024\/01\/image83-2.png\" alt=\"Diagram of components of the genome as estimated in 2014. Reflects 26% Introns, 12% Misc. unique sequences, 8% Misc. heterochromatin, 5% Segmental duplications, 3% Simple sequence repeats, 3% DNA transposons, 8% LTR retro-transposons, 13%% SINEs, 20% LINEs, and 2% Protein-coding genes\" width=\"320\" height=\"268\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-caption-text\">Diagram of components of the genome as estimated in 2014.<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">The\u00a0Human Genome Project\u00a0was completed in 2003, determining the sequence of nucleotide base pairs that make up human DNA, and identifying and mapping all of the genes of the human genome.\u00a0Induced pluripotent stem cells\u00a0were developed in 2006, a technology allowing adult cells to be transformed into stem cells capable of giving rise to any cell type found in the body, potentially of huge importance to the field of\u00a0regenerative medicine.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-OER\" style=\"margin-left: 0pt;\">With the discovery of the\u00a0Higgs boson\u00a0in 2012, the last particle predicted by the\u00a0Standard Model\u00a0of particle physics was found. In 2015,\u00a0gravitational waves, predicted by\u00a0general relativity\u00a0a century before, were\u00a0first observed.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;\">As this survey shows, although the empirical approach today dominates science, such was not always the case. Thinkers like Copernicus, Descartes, Leibniz, Galileo (and more recently Einstein) devised their scientific theories only in part on observation, but to a much larger extent upon their mathematical and logical (rationalist) presuppositions that the universe had to follow fundamental rules of reason. They used observations as proof of their rational explanations of the cosmos.<\/p>\n<p class=\"import-Normal\" style=\"background-color: #ffffff;\">However, beginning with Francis Bacon in the early 17<sup>th<\/sup> century, the tools and assumptions of empiricism came to dominate the scientific enterprise. Empiricists like Bacon and Isaac Newton found observation and experimentation to be the starting point for science. Theories came later.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center;\"><strong>Works Cited<\/strong><\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">\u201cAlbert Einstein &#8211; Colorized.\u201d <i>Wikimedia Commons<\/i>, 19 Feb. 2014, https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Albert_Einstein_-_Colorized.jpg.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Bramley, Barrington. \u201cPortrait of Isaac Newton (1642-1727). This Is a Copy of a Painting by Sir Godfrey Kneller (1689).\u201d <i>Wikimedia Commons<\/i>, 1992, https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:GodfreyKneller-IsaacNewton-1689.jpg. Accessed 13 May 2022.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">\u201cCairo&#8217;s House of Knowledge.\u201d <i>AramcoWorld<\/i>, https:\/\/www.aramcoworld.com\/Articles\/January-2019\/Cairo-s-House-of-Knowledge. Accessed 13 May 2022.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Cameron, Julia Margaret. \u201cA Photograph of Charles Darwin by Julia Margaret Cameron, from 1868.\u201d <i>Wikimedia Commons<\/i>, 1868, https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Charles_Darwin_photograph_by_Julia_Margaret_Cameron,_1868.jpg. Accessed 13 May 2022.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">\u201cCarving on a Mesoptamian Sarcaphogus.\u201d <i>PxHere<\/i>, https:\/\/pxhere.com\/en\/photo\/1367444?utm_content=shareClip&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_source=pxhere. Accessed 13 May 2022.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">\u201cDiagram of Components of the Genome as Estimated in 2014.\u201d <i>Wikimedia Commons<\/i>, 10 Mar. 2014, https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Components_of_the_human_genome.png. Accessed 13 May 2022.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">\u201cGalileo Galilei (1564-1642). Oil Painting by an Italian Painter, 18th (?) Century.\u201d <i>Wikimedia Commons<\/i>, https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Galileo_Galilei_(1564-1642)._Oil_painting_by_an_Italian_pain_Wellcome_V0023487.jpg. Accessed 13 May 2022.<\/p>\n<p class=\"hanging-indent\">Westermayr, Konrad. \u201cNICOLAUS COPERNICUS.\u201d <i>Wikimedia Commons<\/i>, 1804, https:\/\/commons.wikimedia.org\/wiki\/File:Nicolaus_Copernicus_AGE_V13_1804.jpg. Accessed 13 May 2022.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":101,"menu_order":2,"template":"","meta":{"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":"cc-by-nc"},"chapter-type":[48],"contributor":[62,63],"license":[55],"class_list":["post-2851","chapter","type-chapter","status-publish","hentry","chapter-type-numberless","contributor-daniel-g-shaw","contributor-ph-d","license-cc-by-nc"],"part":2839,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/2851","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/chapter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/101"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/2851\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2970,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/2851\/revisions\/2970"}],"part":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/parts\/2839"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapters\/2851\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2851"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"chapter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/chapter-type?post=2851"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=2851"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/pressbooks.ccconline.org\/introtophilosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=2851"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}