The inconsistent tense in the e-mail will very likely distract the reader from its overall point. In the professional world, your coworkers will most likely not correct your verb tenses or call attention to grammatical errors. Still, it is essential to remember that these errors do have a subtle negative impact in the workplace, just as they do when applying for jobs and communicating with clients. If you keep making small mistakes like this, the receiver of your message may assume you ignore little details.
Simplifying Verbs
Another issue that writers have is overcomplicating their verbs with extra words. In almost every instance, if you realize you can simplify your writing by taking out words, that is the best option. In regards to verbs, the issue typically stems from writers using passive voice and nominalizations in their writing.
Active Voice and Passive Voice
Even with consistent verb tenses, writers often overcomplicate their writing by expressing the action in as many words as possible. One way they do this is by using the passive voice. Consider the following sentences, for instance. Which would you prefer to read?
PASSIVE VOICE
The candidate cannot be supported by our membership. |
ACTIVE VOICE
Our members cannot support the candidate. |
Most readers would prefer the second option. Why? Here, the active voice construction on the right uses two fewer words to say the same thing. As a result, it is more direct than the passive voice construction. How does it do that?
First, let’s define the two terms. The active voice is a sentence structure in which the subject carries out the action, while the passive voice is a sentence structure in which the subject receives the action.
Essentially, it all comes down to the subject and verb. Who is the subject of the passive voice sentence? It’s not “the candidate” because they do not do the sentence’s action. The subject is “our membership” because they provide support.
In the active voice sentence, “members” has been moved to the start of the sentence. They are doing the action.
Both sentences are valid grammatically. You could use either format in your writing, and the reader would understand what you are saying. However, the active voice is generally better since active sentences tend to be shorter, more precise, and easier to understand.
There are legitimate uses of the passive voice, though. When you want to deemphasize the action’s doer, the passive voice is a good choice. Look at the example below.
Ten late arrivals were recorded this month
In this example, the passive voice above doesn’t place blame or credit so that it can be more diplomatic in some contexts. Passive voice also allows the writer to avoid personal references or personal pronouns (he, she, they) to create a more objective tone. Additionally, there are situations where the doer of the action is unknown, as in the following example.
Graffiti was painted on the side of our building last night.
We don’t know who created the graffiti, so a passive form is valid here.
However, keep in mind that overusing the passive voice sounds unnatural and appears as an attempt to extend the word count or sound more fancy and objective. Most readers prefer the active voice because the passive voice is either more wordy or vague. Nevertheless, it is essential to consider what is conventional in the writing you’re engaging in—for instance. Specific disciplines require that lab reports use the passive voice.
Nominalization
Another issue that overcomplicates writing is when writers turn the main action they describe into nouns, a process called nominalization. This involves taking a verb and adding a suffix such as -ant, -ent, -ion, -tion, -sion, -ence, -ance, or -ing, as well as adding forms of other verbs, such as “to make” or “to give.” Nominalization may also require articles (the, a, or an) before the action nouns. Consider the following comparisons of nominalized-verb sentences with simplified verb forms:
NOMINALIZED FORM
The committee had a discussion about the new budget constraints. |
SIMPLIFIED FORM
The committee discussed the new budget constraints. |
We will make a recommendation to proceed with the investment option. |
We will recommend proceeding with the investment option. |
They handed down a judgment that the offer wasn’t worth their time. |
They judged that the offer wasn’t worth their time. |
The regulator will grant approval of the new process within the week. |
The regulator will approve the new process within the week. |
He always gives me advice on what to say to the media. |
He always advises me on what to say to the media. |
She’s giving your application a pass because of all the errors in it. |
She’s passing on your application because of all the errors in it. |
You can tell that the simplified sentences have a greater impact than those that use nominalizations. In all the nominalization examples, more words are required to say the same thing. When writing contains all three issues we’ve discussed (inconsistent verb tense, passive voice, and nominalizations), it becomes muddled and lacks the clarity expected in professional writing.
Read the sentences below. Determine whether there is an issue with the passive voice or nominalizations. Then, try to simplify the sentence. Please note that our solution is just one possible solution. If yours doesn’t match, it could still be correct. Check with your instructor if you’re not sure.